Leon County v. State
Decision Date | 07 February 1936 |
Citation | 122 Fla. 505,165 So. 666 |
Parties | LEON COUNTY v. STATE. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
En Banc.
Proceeding by the County of Leon against the State of Florida. From an adverse decree, the plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed. Appeal from Circuit Court, Leon County; E. C Love, Judge.
William Blount Myers, of Tallahassee, for appellant.
O. C. Parker, Jr., State's Atty., of Tallahassee, for the State.
This is an appeal from a final decree of the circuit court of the Second judicial circuit of Florida in a proceeding brought under section 5106, C.G.L., section 3296, R.G.S., et seq praying for validation of certain tax anticipation certificates of indebtedness proposed to be issued by the county of Leon for the purpose of presently funding a county building tax provided for and levied under the provisions of section 2384, C.G.L., section 1556, R.G.S., for the purpose of erecting in said county a new jail as provided for by law.
The circuit judge was of the opinion that the tax anticipation certificates of indebtedness thus sought to be herein validated were in fact and in law 'bonds' as contemplated by amended section 6 of article 9 of the Constitution of Florida and that as such they should not be issued, nor confirmed by decree of the circuit court, until after the same should be first submitted to, and approved by a majority of the votes cast in an election in which a majority of the freeholders who were freeholders residing in Leon county, should participate. Accordingly, said judge denied the prayer of the petition for validation and entered his decree to that effect, from which this appeal has been taken on behalf of the authorities of Leon county, as petitioners in the court below.
Any contractual device for the present funding of tax revenues contemplated to be raised or made available for reimbursement in future years, contrived to be issued as an enforceable legal security to the obligee, or his assignee, by means of which such obligee or his assignee will acquire a legal or equitable right to coerce by judicial processes the repayment of a sum of money advanced on the strength thereof, together with interest for the hire of the amount advanced, however calculated or provided to be paid upon the sum so involved, is in contemplation of amended section 6 of article 9 of the Constitution of Florida a 'bond' and within the purview of the specific prohibitions and limitations of that section as to the issuance of 'bonds.' This is so, not only because any scheme of public financing, directly or indirectly, immediately or contingently calculated to obligate the future taxing power of the obligor, is within the scope of the Florida constitutional limitation on the issuance of 'bonds,' but because such contemplated obligation of the powers of future taxation can no more be afterwards repudiated as forming no part of the present transaction for a funding of the future public resources than a mortgage executed as security for a note can be subsequently disregarded as forming no part of the contractual arrangement evidenced by the negotiation of the same. See City of Clearwater v. State ex rel. United Mutual Life Ins. Co., 108 Fla. 623, 147 So. 459, citing to this effect Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 142 La. 812, 77 So. 640.
The petition for validation shows that on the 24th day of January, 1935, a resolution was duly adopted by the board of county commissioners of the county of Leon, in the state of Florida wherein it was recited that it was deemed necessary to erect a new jail for Leon county, Fla., and which provided for giving notice that at the next regular meeting of the board to be held on March 7, 1935, the question of whether or not a levy would be made for the purpose of constructing such jail to be acted upon by said board.
Due notice of said meeting was given, and at such meeting a resolution was adopted by said board wherein the necessity of the erection of such jail was determined and there was in and by said resolution levied a building tax of not exceeding five (5) mills per annum for five (5) consecutive years beginning with the year 1935 in lieu of all other county building tax, the amount necessary to be collected each year in order to construct said jail building, with or without federal funds, to be determined and included in the budget of said board in each of the five (5) years aforesaid, the tax so levied to be assessed and collected at the same time and in the same manner as other state and county taxes are collected.
Thereafter, on September 2, 1935, the said board adopted a resolution reciting the facts hereinabove set forth and further reciting that it then appeared that in order to construct the jail building provided for by the previous resolution, it was necessary to anticipate the collection of the taxes provided for in said resolution and to borrow the money contemplated to be realized from such levy; and further reciting that it appeared that said levy, based upon the then present taxable value, over the period of years for which such levy had been and lawfully might be made, would produce a sum of not less than $85,000. The said resolution then provided for the issuance of certain tax anticipation certificates of indebtedness, describing the numbers, denominations, and maturities thereof, place of payment, and other form and details of said certificates, and described the security to be given incident thereto as follows:
The resolution further provided that the attorney for said board should prepare the form of such tax anticipation certificates of indebtedness and should take the necessary proceedings for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. City of Tampa
... ... Decree for ... plaintiff, and defendants appeal ... Affirmed ... [137 Fla. 29] Appeal from Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; ... Harry N. Sandler, judge ... COUNSEL ... J. Rex ... Farrior, State Atty., W. F. Himes, and McKay, Macfarlane, ... 168 So. 545; State v. City of Clearwater, 124 Fla ... 354, 168 So. 546; State v. City of Punta Gorda, 124 ... Fla. 512, 168 So. 835; Leon County v. State, 122 ... Fla. 505, 165 So. 666; Tapers v. Pichard, 124 Fla ... 549, 46. So. 39; Roach v. City of Tampa, 125 Fla ... 62, 169 ... ...
-
State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency
...in the present to be discharged out of public revenues anticipated to be realized or raised in the future. Leon County v. State, 122 Fla. 505, 514, 165 So. 666, 669 (1936). Two preliminary observations are in order. First, we observe that the recitals in the statute and in the bond resoluti......
-
State Ex Rel. Harrington v. City of Pompano
... ... mandamus proceeding by the State of Florida, on the relation ... of Charles E. Harrington and others, as trustees of Broward ... County Bondholders' Association, against the City of ... Pompano, to compel municipal taxation of all taxable ... property, including homesteads, in the ... Marion County, 121 Fla. 17, 163 ... So. 298, 102 A.L.R. 659; Board of Public Instruction v ... State, 121 Fla. 703, 164 So. 697; Leon County v ... State, 122 Fla. 505, 165 So. 666; State v. City of ... Pensacola, 123 Fla. 331, 166 So. 851; Hopkins v ... Baldwin, 123 Fla ... ...
-
State v. City of De Land
... ... From a decree of ... validation, the State appeals ... Affirmed ... [135 Fla. 540] Appeal from Circuit Court, Volusia County; H ... B. Frederick, judge ... COUNSEL ... Murray ... Sams, State Atty., of DeLand, for the State ... Neill ... 300; Herbert v. City of Daytona Beach, 121 Fla ... 212, 163 So. 565, 566; Boykin v. Town of River ... Junction, 121 Fla. 902, 164 So. 558; Leon County v ... State, 122 Fla. 505, 165 So.666; Board of County ... Commissioners of Pinellas County v. Herrick, 123 Fla ... 619, 167 So. 386; ... ...