Leonard v. McMorris, 00-1324.
| Decision Date | 26 February 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 00-1324.,00-1324. |
| Citation | 320 F.3d 1116 |
| Parties | Ralph T. LEONARD; Russell K. Myers; Paul E. Enzman; John R. Klaas; Michael E. Hogan; Ivan Roth; John R. Towner; Ronald Coffin; Alvin G. Larch; Paul R. Bishop; Ervin Rhoades; Henry Allen Prichard; Ralph Nelson; Darrell O. Porter; Larry Jacks; Leann Sandoval; Jennifer Clair; Merle W. Kiesel; Ryan Tarone; Cynthia Garcia; Yvonne Carsten; Rene Easter; Darlene Nicholas; Larry L. Weickum; Anthony A. Sanchez; Todd Stroh; William J. Crackel; Gene Dutton; Guy Cook; Rick Long; Tom Gardner; Dennis Craig; Clifford Elrod; Virgil Eggleston; James Goerig; Doug Hanevik; Donald Kneebone; Greg Cole; Tony Kmoch; Frank Hill; Michael Luxner; Creed Huff; Terry Harvey; Robert Wagenknecht; Steven G. Larghe; Richard Echtenkamp; Melvin G. Teter; Tyler U. Iungerich; Ronald F. Cooley; David Capshaw; Charles Bleakley; Larry Jones; Ted Schwartz; and Evan Howard, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jerry D. McMORRIS; Harold R. Roth; George R. Roberge; James R. Feehan; Mike Hampton; Lester Smith; Neal Barkley; Robert Cline; Cal Wolfe, and Terry Jensen, Defendants-Appellants, Colorado Association of Commerce and Industry; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Amici Curiae. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (D.C. No. 99-N-1306).
James E. Scarboro (Timothy R. Macdonald with him on the briefs), Arnold & Porter, Denver, CO, for the Defendants-Appellants.
Evan S. Lipstein, Law Offices of Evan S. Lipstein PC, Lakewood, CO (Michael B. Levy, Law Offices of Evan S. Lipstein PC, Lakewood, CO; Kip B. Shuman and Jeffrey A. Berens, Dyer & Shuman, LLP, Denver, CO, with him on the brief), for the Plaintiffs-Appellees.
John R. Webb, Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Denver, CO, for the Colorado Association of Commerce and Industry, Amicus Curiae; Frederick Perillo and Jill M. Hartley, Previant, Goldberg, Uelmen, Gratz, Miller & Brueggeman S.C., Milwaukee WI, for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Amicus Curiae.
Before TACHA, Chief Judge, GARTH* and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs, former employees of a now bankrupt corporation, brought this action against the officers of the corporation to recover wages and benefits not received as a result of the Chapter 11 filing. Plaintiffs assert their claims under the Colorado Wage Claim Act, Colo.Rev.Stat. § 8-4-101 et seq. (1999). Defendants filed this interlocutory appeal from the district court's grant of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
The facts of this case are not in dispute and are set out in Leonard v. McMorris, 106 F.Supp.2d 1098, 1104-05 (D.Colo. 2000):
Defendants Jerry D. McMorris, Harold R. Roth, George R. Roberge, James R. Feehan, Neal Barkley, Robert Cline, Cal Wolfe, and Terry Jensen are corporate officers of NationsWay Transport Service, Inc. ("NationsWay"). Nations-Way was one of the largest privately held trucking companies in the United States.
As of May 1999, NationsWay had more than 3200 employees in forty-three different States. Of these employees, more than 2000 were members of eighty-nine different local unions that have 144 different collective bargaining agreements (hereinafter, "CBA" or "CBAs") with NationsWay. The eighty-nine local unions are affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America ("Teamsters"), which has its own nationwide CBA with NationsWay entitled the National Master Freight Agreement ("National Master CBA"). In addition, each of the eighty-nine local unions has entered one or more supplemental agreements with NationsWay modifying the National Master CBA....
On February 11, 1999, the NationsWay board of directors executed a resolution authorizing Roth and William Ward, a NationsWay senior vice president, to execute a petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On May 20, 1999, NationsWay filed a petition for bankruptcy protection pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona. Later that day, NationsWay terminated the employment of most of its employees, including the plaintiffs herein.
On June 7, 1999, plaintiffs filed their complaint in Denver County District Court. On July 9, 1999, defendants removed the action to this court. On August 11, 1999, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. In the amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that defendants were liable for those wages which plaintiffs had earned at the time that their employment terminated but were unpaid, pursuant to the Wage Act. On October 12, 1999, defendants filed their motion for summary judgment. Defendants claim that they are entitled to summary judgment because the Wage Act does not impose personal liability on individual corporate officers and, even if it does, there can be no personal liability if the corporation is not subject to liability by operation of the Bankruptcy Code. Defendants further argue that, even if the Wage Act imposes liability upon them individually, the Wage Act is preempted (1) by the Bankruptcy Code, and (2) by the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) [hereinafter "LMRA"], for those of the plaintiffs who are subject to NationsWay's collective bargaining agreements with the Teamsters. On January 13, 2000, plaintiffs filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment as to defendants' liability only. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to summary judgment as to defendants' liability under the Wage Act because:
(1) the Wage Act imposes personal liability for earned but unpaid wages upon corporate officers; (2) plaintiffs' claims are not preempted by the Bankruptcy Code; (3) the LMRA does not preempt the Wage Act claims of those plaintiffs who are subject to a collective bargaining agreement; and (4) none of the other miscellaneous affirmative defenses which defendants assert bar plaintiffs' first claim.
(Internal record citations and footnotes omitted.) The district court granted plaintiffs' motion for partial judgment with respect to defendants McMorris, Roth, Roberge, Feehan, Barkley, Cline, Wolfe, and Jensen as to liability under the Colorado Wage Act. The court certified its order for interlocutory appeal, finding there was "substantial ground" for difference of opinion on each of the controlling legal issues involved. App. II at 846.
While this appeal...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Im v. Pearl Dragon Rest., Inc.
...under the Wage Act is one matter, but the impositionof a penalty is another matter entirely."), rev'd on other grounds by 320 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 2003). An employer who fails to tender a payment of wages within the fourteen-day period is subject to a penalty, but their ultimate liability f......
-
Blixseth v. Credit Suisse AG
...entity filing the bankruptcy petition, it couldhave drafted the Bankruptcy Code to so provide"), reversed on state law grounds, 320 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 2003). Although Congress has provided remedies designed to prohibit misuse of the bankruptcy process, Credit Suisse does not identify whic......
-
Blixseth v. Credit Suisse AG
...entity filing the bankruptcy petition, it could have drafted the Bankruptcy Code to so provide"), reversed on state law grounds, 320 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 2003). Although Congress has provided remedies designed to prohibit misuse of the bankruptcy process, Credit Suisse does not identify whi......
-
Good Faith and the Duty of Disclosure
...question certified, 272 F.3d 1295, certified question answered, 63 P.3d 323, reh'g denied, answer to certified question conformed to 320 F.3d 1116 ('"without good faith legal justification,'. . . means willfully withheld without good cause"). [30] CRCP 16.2(1) [31] Daniels v. Daniels, 10 P.......
-
"use-it-or-lose-it" Benefit Policies and the Colorado Wage Claim Act
..."Advisory Bulletins and Resource Guide, Colorado Division of Labor Advisory Bulletin: Vacation Pay 5(I)" (2010). 7. Leonard v. McMorris, 320 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 2000). 8. Boothby v. Atlas Mechanical Inc., 6 Cal.App.4th 1595 (1992) (but permitting a maximum accrual vacation policy as long a......
-
New Developments in Colorado Wage Law
...2003), rehearing denied (Colo. Feb. 24, 2003). 3. Leonard v. McMorris, 106 F.Supp.2d 1098 (D.Colo. 2000), rev'd, Leonard v. McMorris, 320 F.3d 1116, 1117 Cir. 2003). 4. CRS § 8-4-101(4) (1999) ("Employer" means "every person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, migratory field labo......