Leone v. Bj's Wholesale Club Inc.
| Decision Date | 01 November 2011 |
| Citation | 931 N.Y.S.2d 327,89 A.D.3d 406,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 07673 |
| Parties | Nina Marie LEONE, Plaintiff,v.BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC., Defendant–Appellant,A.A.A. Refrigeration Services, Inc., Defendant,Killion Industries, Inc., Defendant–Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Torino & Bernstein, P.C., Mineola (Bruce A. Torino of counsel), for appellant.Law Office of Andrea G. Sawyers, Melville (David R. Holland of counsel), for defendant-respondent.GONZALEZ, P.J., TOM, SWEENY, RENWICK, ROMÁN, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered October 19, 2010, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant Killion Industries, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it, and denied defendant BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.'s cross motion for summary judgment on its claims for indemnification against Killion, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff was injured when she slipped on water leaking from a refrigerated flower display case in a store owned by defendant BJ's. Defendant Killion, the designer and manufacturer of the display case, established prima facie that plaintiff's injury did not arise from a design defect in the display case. The evidence showed that the display case's condensation evaporation pans had twice the capacity prescribed by the applicable industry standard ( see Carmona v. Mathisson, 54 A.D.3d 633, 865 N.Y.S.2d 35 [2008] ). The expert affidavit that defendant BJ's offered in opposition failed to raise a triable issue of fact, since the expert had not inspected the subject display case; nor did he opine that the design of the display case failed to comply with applicable industry standards ( see Ramos v. Howard Indus., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 218, 223–224, 855 N.Y.S.2d 412, 885 N.E.2d 176 [2008]; Vasquez v. The Rector, 40 A.D.3d 265, 266–267, 835 N.Y.S.2d 159 [2007] ).
Killion also established that plaintiff's injury was not proximately caused by any failure on its part to warn of potential dangerous uses of the display case such as pouring water from the flower buckets into it. The evidence showed that an employee of BJ's knew that the display case could only handle its own condensate and that additional water would leak or spill out ( see Stewart v. Honeywell Intl. Inc., 65 A.D.3d 864, 884 N.Y.S.2d 743 [2009] ).
Given Killion's freedom from liability for plaintiff's injury, there is no basis for...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Acquisto v. Manitowoc Co.
...when she slipped on water leaking from a refrigerated flower display case in a store owned by defendant BJ's." 89 A.D.3d 406, 407, 931 N.Y.S.2d 327, 328 (1st Dep't 2011). The co-defendant manufacturer moved for summary judgment, submitting evidence that the display case's "condensation evap......
- Rosenblum v. the City of N.Y.
-
Biberman v. The City of New York
...designed (See e.g.. Reeps v BMW of N. Am.. LLC. 94 A.D.3d 475, 475-76 [1st Dept 2012]; see also Leone v BJ's Wholesale Club. Inc.. 89 A.D.3d 406, 407 [1st Dept 2011]). Contrary to Pexco's claim, however, it is Pexco that bears the initial burden to establish such compliance. Pexco has not d......
-
Glockenberg v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
...injured plaintiff's injury, and Costco failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition to that showing ( see Leone v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc., 89 A.D.3d 406, 407, 931 N.Y.S.2d 327). The Supreme Court erred however, in granting that branch of Peggs's motion which was for summary judgment di......