Levert v. Gavin

Decision Date25 June 1963
PartiesApplication of Albert M. LEVERT, For an Order v. Joseph G. GAVIN, Jr., et al.
CourtNew York Supreme Court

Albert M. Levert, Northport, for petitioner.

Corwin & Stuckart, Huntington, for respondents.

JACK STANISLAW, Justice.

The petitioner seeks an order 'adjudging that the proceedings of the respondents [Central School District No. 6, Town of Huntington] at the regular annual meeting * * * and the subsequent action of the voters of said school district * * * in adopting the school budget for the year July 1, 1963 to June 30, 1964, is invalid, illegal and void.'

Petitioner contends that the budget, including an item of $2,528.40 for payment of a legal fee, is void for that item. He states that the legal services the subject of this bill were rendered to certain school board members individually and not in their official capacity. For this reason the budget is purportedly illegal. Respondents take the position that legal services were rendered school board members involved in a law suit in their official capacity.

On May 7, 1963, respondents presented the school budget at a regular annual district meeting. On the following day the budget was submitted to the voters in the district and adopted. Petitioner here asks the enjoining of any levy of taxes pursuant to this budget.

The application is made at this time to avoid a proceeding after taxation in the nature of a taxpayer's suit. The remedy sought herein is predicated on the hypothesis that the controversy is one that may be directly reviewed or adjudicated by this court. Leone v. Hunter, 21 Misc.2d 750, 191 N.Y.S.2d 334; Application of Lombardo, 37 Misc.2d 436, 235 N.Y.S.2d 1010; Prendergast v. Bd. of Educ. of NYC, 192 Misc. 376, 80 N.Y.S.2d 739; Miller v. Gould, 121 Misc. 270, 200 N.Y.S. 884; Madeo v. McGuire, Sup., 192 N.Y.S.2d 936, 938 ('Remedy under Section 310 of the Education Law is not exclusive. In a proper case redress may be had to the courts.')

Respondent relies on the said Section 310 of the Education Law, which relates in part that 'Any person conceiving himself aggrieved may appeal or petition to the commissioner of education * * *. Such appeal or petition may be made in consequence of any action: 1. By any school district meeting. * * * 7. By any other official act or decision of any officer, school authorities, or meetings concerning any other matter under this chapter, or any other act pertaining to common schools.' This section is cited in conjunction with Section 2037: 'All disputes concerning the validity of any district meeting or election or of any of the acts of the officers of such meeting or election shall be referred to the commissioner of education for determination and his decisions in the matter shall be final and not subject to review.' Though persons aggrieved may appeal (Section 310) to the commissioner (Madeo v. McGuire, supra), disputes (Section 2037) are referred to the commissioner mandatorily. Guariglia v. De Furio, 34 Misc.2d 200, 228 N.Y.S.2d 697; Application of Pipe & Engineering Co., Sup., 220 N.Y.S.2d 175; Pacos v. Hunter, 29 Misc.2d 404, 218 N.Y.S.2d 354, appeal dismissed 11 N.Y.2d 1112, 230 N.Y.S.2d 735, 184 N.E.2d 322; Mullooly v. U. F. S. D. No. 8, 20 Misc.2d 795, 796, 190 N.Y.S.2d 809, 811 (contention that proposed school budget meeting would be invalid, held, 'reviewable by the Commissioner').

The obvious conflict on procedure to be followed in the cited cases should be resolved. Until such resolution each court...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Tombler v. Board of Ed. of Brookhaven-Comsewogue Union Free School Dist., BROOKHAVEN-COMSEWOGUE
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 8 July 1981
    ...Commissioner where "orderly, technical and professionally competent review" by him adequately protects those aggrieved (Levert v. Gavin, 39 Misc.2d 569, 241 N.Y.S.2d 300). Thus, the courts have refused to assume jurisdiction in matters over which sole jurisdiction has been delegated to the ......
  • Union Free School Dist. No. 7, Town of Greenburgh, Westchester County v. Nowicki
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 3 June 1968
    ...office of the Commissioner of Education is empowered to deal with these problems both administratively and legally. See, Levert v. Gavin, 39 Misc2d 569, 241 N.Y.S.2d 300 (Supreme Court Suffolk, 1963), Leeds v. Board of Education, 19 Misc.2d 860, 190 N.Y.S.2d 127 (Supreme Court Nassau 1959),......
  • Gustin v. Joiner
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 13 July 1978
    ...81 Misc.2d 1043, 367 N.Y.S.2d 164; Matter of Hardy v. Commissioner of Education, 66 Misc.2d 984, 322 N.Y.S.2d 918; Matter of Levert v. Gavin, 39 Misc.2d 569, 241 N.Y.S.2d 300. The court finds, however, that the cases cited by petitioner, to wit, Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education, 243 ......
  • Board of Ed., Union Free School Dist. No. 6, Town of Babylon, Suffolk County v. Board of Co-op. Educational Services, Third Supervisory Dist., Suffolk County
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 17 January 1964
    ...for relief might be available in this dispute (Education Law, §§ 310, 2037), as this court has previously acknowledged (Levert v. Gavin, 39 Misc.2d 569, 241 N.Y.S.2d 300). However, the issues here are of first impression with respect to the interpretation to be given parts of section 1958 o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT