Levin v. State
Decision Date | 01 October 2015 |
Docket Number | No. A15A1519.,A15A1519. |
Citation | 334 Ga.App. 71,778 S.E.2d 238 |
Parties | LEVIN v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
James Kenneth Luttrell, Woodstock, for Appellant.
Emily Kathleen Richardson, Brian Keith Fortner, for Appellee.
In 1994, Gregory A. Levin was tried by a jury and convicted of kidnapping with bodily injury, two counts of aggravated assault, burglary, cruelty to children, aggravated battery, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and making harassing phone calls.1The trial court merged the aggravated battery conviction into the kidnapping with bodily injury conviction and sentenced Levin to a total of life plus 48 years in confinement. Levin appealed, and this Court reversed his conviction for making harassing telephone calls based on an improper verdict form, and his convictions for aggravated assault and possession of a firearm based on erroneous jury charges. Levin v. State,222 Ga.App. 123, 126–127(5), (6), 473 S.E.2d 582 (1996).
In 2014, the Georgia Supreme Court reversed Levin's conviction for kidnapping with bodily injury and vacated his life sentence based on the State's failure to satisfy the asportation requirement as set forth in Garza v. State,284 Ga. 696, 670 S.E.2d 73 (2008).2
Levin v. Morales,295 Ga. 781, 764S.E.2d 145 (2014). The Court also noted that the aggravated battery conviction had been merged into the kidnapping conviction and ordered, “[n]ow that the kidnapping conviction has been reversed, on remand the trial court will need to revisit sentencing appellant on the conviction for aggravated battery.” Id. at 784, 764 S.E.2d 145.
On remand, the trial court conducted a resentencing hearing and on the day of the hearing, Levin filed a plea in bar on double jeopardy grounds, seeking dismissal of the aggravated battery count of the indictment. The trial court denied the plea in bar, and sentenced Levin to 20 years in confinement for the aggravated battery conviction. Levin now appeals the trial court's denial of his plea in bar and his resentencing. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
The facts of the case, as set forth in the Georgia Supreme Court's opinion, are as follows:
Levin,295 Ga. at 781–782, 764 S.E.2d 145.
1. Levin contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for aggravated battery, which was based on his indictment for maliciously causing bodily harm to the victim “by seriously disfiguring her body by repeatedly beating her about her head, face and body.” He argues that the evidence only showed some bruising on the victim's face and did not rise to the level of serious disfigurement. We disagree.
“Following a criminal conviction, the defendant is no longer presumed innocent, and we view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustain the verdict.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Jones v. State,329 Ga.App. 439, 765 S.E.2d 639 (2014). So viewed, the evidence showed that after the victim was rescued by the SWAT team, she was taken to the hospital. Her daughter saw her when she arrived at the hospital and testified that she looked like “[a] pumpkin.” “Her face was swollen ... and she had a real bad bruised eye
and she had blood on her and her lips were swollen. Basically her whole face was swollen.” The victim testified that Levin repeatedly slapped and hit her, kicked her in the stomach, hit her in the back with a large bureau mirror, punched her in the nose, beat her with the gun, choked her, and dragged her around with his arm around her throat. He also rammed the gun and his finger sharply into her eye, slammed her against the refrigerator, and hit her in the back of the head with the gun so hard that she couldn't stand up, lost her balance, and thought she had a concussion. Police officers at the hospital observed the victim's injuries and took photographs, which showed her bruised and swollen face, with one eye swollen shut, and a “goose egg” on her face. The victim also sustained injuries to her hands, which photographs showed were bruised and swollen from the beating, and her feet, which were cut from walking on glass Levin had broken.
A person commits the offense of aggravated battery when he or she maliciously causes bodily harm to another ... by seriously disfiguring his or her body or a member thereof. OCGA § 16–5–24(a). Although OCGA § 16–5–24does not define the term “serious disfiguring,” this Court has ruled that the crime of aggravated battery does not require that the victim's disfigurement be permanent; however, the injury must be more severe than a mere visible or superficial wound
. Notwithstanding this threshold for determining whether the disfiguring injuries meet the requisite level of seriousness to constitute an aggravated battery, we have further acknowledged that the circumstances of each aggravated battery vary; thus, whether a disfigurement is serious is almost always a question for the jury to resolve on a case-by-case basis.
(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Jones,329 Ga.App. at 443(1)(a), 765 S.E.2d 639.
Based on the evidence of the victim's injuries, the jury could reasonably find that the combined injuries to her face, eyes, head, hands, and feet were more than mere visible or superficial wounds
and that the victim's disfigurement was serious. See Penland v. State,229 Ga. 256, 257(1), 190 S.E.2d 900 (1972)(evidence...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Levin v. State
...follow, we affirm.The complicated procedural history of this case is, for the most part, set out in the opinion in Levin v. State , 334 Ga. App. 71, 778 S.E.2d 238 (2015). (Additional details will be added as needed.)In 1994, Gregory A. Levin was tried by a jury [in the Superior Court of Do......
-
State v. Petion
...State v. Anderson , 16 Conn. App. 346, 357, 547 A.2d 1368, cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828, 552 A.2d 433 (1988) ; Levin v. State , 334 Ga. App. 71, 74, 778 S.E.2d 238 (2015), cert. denied, Georgia Supreme Court, Docket No. S16C0249 (January 11, 2016); Sloan v. State , Docket No. 49A02-1002-CR-1......
-
Fassnacht v. Moler
...which carried a sentence of imprisonment of between 3 and 20 years. See OCGA § 16-5-24 (a), (h) (2012);8 Levin v. State , 334 Ga. App. 71, 74 (1), 778 S.E.2d 238 (2015) (jury authorized to find defendant guilty of aggravated battery based on serious disfigurement, where beaten victim had a ......
-
Shaw v. State
...disfigurement be permanent; however, the injury must be more severe than a mere visible or superficial wound." Levin v. State , 334 Ga.App. 71, 74 (1), 778 S.E.2d 238 (2015) (citation, punctuation, and emphasis omitted). The question of whether the defendant's actions caused "serious disfig......