Levin v. State
Decision Date | 08 January 2020 |
Docket Number | No. 1D19-3578,1D19-3578 |
Citation | 298 So.3d 681 |
Parties | Joseph Luis LEVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Joseph Luis Levin, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
ON MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON APPEAL
Appellant moved to supplement the record on appeal of a summarily-denied postconviction motion on October 15, 2019. We deny the motion because it fails to demonstrate that the items sought fall within the scope of the record as defined by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)(A).
Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b) governs appeals from certain postconviction proceedings and specifies what documents may be included in the record:
When a motion for postconviction relief under rules 3.800(a), 3.801, 3.802, 3.850, or 3.853 is granted or denied without an evidentiary hearing, the clerk of the lower tribunal shall electronically transmit to the court, as the record , the motion, response, reply, order on the motion, motion for rehearing, response, reply, order on the motion for rehearing, and attachments to any of the foregoing, together with the certified copy of the notice of appeal.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A) (emphasis added). The motion under review was filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and the trial court denied it without evidentiary hearing. The documents Levin seeks were not attached to his motion, any response or reply, or the order; they were not before the postconviction court when it ruled on the motion and thus may not be before us when we review the order. Accordingly, they cannot be included in the record. See St. Cyr v. State , 126 So. 3d 1166, 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ( ); Williams v. State , 244 So. 3d 1173, 1175 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ();* see also Partlow v. State , 44 So.3d 399 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 20, 2019) (Winokur, J., concurring specially) ( ).
* We note that if the record permitted by Rule 9.141(b)(2)(A) does not "show[ ] conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief," then "the order shall be reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief." Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). "A lack of an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ali v. State
... ... to mitigate sentence. However, as Defendant correctly notes, ... the record on appeal of the summary denial of a motion for ... postconviction relief is limited under Florida Rule of ... Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)(A). See Levin v ... State, 298 So.3d 681, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020). Because ... rule 9.141(b)(2)(A)'s scope does not include a hearing ... transcript on a motion to mitigate sentence, Defendant is ... prohibited from including the transcript in the record ... See Fla. R. App. P ... ...
- Torres v. State, No. 4D20-299
-
Nicolas v. State
... ... Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Notwithstanding their ... inclusion in the record, we did not consider those ... submissions in our adjudication of the instant appeal ... See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A); Levin v ... State, 298 So.3d 681, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) ... (confirming that, with respect to appeals from orders denying ... rule 3.850 motions, the record on appeal is limited pursuant ... to rule 9.141(b)(2)(A) and cannot be supplemented beyond what ... the rule ... ...
-
Nicolas v. State
...did not consider those submissions in our adjudication of the instant appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A) ; Levin v. State, 298 So. 3d 681, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (confirming that, with respect to appeals from orders denying rule 3.850 motions, the record on appeal is limited pursua......