Lewis v. Illinois Emp. Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 31 October 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. B-8553,B-8553 |
| Citation | 590 S.W.2d 119 |
| Parties | Shorty Ray LEWIS, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Tonahill & Hile, Joe H. Tonahill, Jasper, for petitioner.
Boswell, O'Toole, Davis & Pickering, Mark T. Price and Susan Crowley, Houston, for respondents.
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR
The court of civil appeals has reversed the judgment of the trial court that had rendered a default judgment for the plaintiff, Shorty Ray Lewis, after striking the defendants' pleadings as a sanction for their failure to answer interrogatories. 582 S.W.2d 242. Plaintiff Lewis filed suit on June 6, 1978, and then filed a request for admissions which were answered and filed ten days after the request. Plaintiff then served defendants with written interrogatories on July 14, but the defendants did not file their answers by August 13. See Rule 168, Tex.R.Civ.P. On August 28, plaintiff filed a motion that the trial court strike defendants' pleadings and render default judgment for the plaintiff. On September 1, 1978, the defendants filed their answers, but the trial court, on the same day but after the answers were filed, granted plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' pleadings and then rendered a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Upon this state of the facts, the court of civil appeals held that the trial court abused its discretion. We approve that holding, but disapprove the broad dictum of that court that the sanctions authorized by Rule 215a(c) can be invoked only upon a party's (1) filing a motion to compel answers to interrogatories, (2) which is followed by a court order which requires the answers, and (3) a failure to comply with that court order.
Rule 168 requires such a procedure in the instance of one's failure to answer particular interrogatories. When, however, a party wholly fails to answer any of the interrogatories, the propounding party may immediately move for the imposition of sanctions without first seeking and obtaining an order from the court requiring answers to interrogatories. This distinction between one's failure to answer particular interrogatories and one's complete failure to make answers is found in Rule 168.
If a party refuses to answer any interrogatory, the proponent of the question may, upon reasonable notice to all persons affected, apply to the court in which the action is pending for an order compelling an answer. Reasonable expenses,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.
...Dist.] 1981, no writ); Ill. Emp'rs Ins. Co. of Wausau v. Lewis, 582 S.W.2d 242 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont), writ ref'd n.r.e.,590 S.W.2d 119 (Tex.1979) (per curiam). 10. Since the court of appeals decision in this case, another court of appeals has upheld death-penalty sanctions that precluded ......
-
Neal v. Wisconsin Hard Chrome, Inc.
...1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Ill. Employers Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 582 S.W.2d 242, 244 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont), writ ref'd n.r.e., 590 S.W.2d 119 (Tex.1979); Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.R. Co. v. Franks, 399 S.W.2d 905, 907 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1966, writ dism'd by agr.); Halbert v. Sylestine, 292 S.W......
-
Fears v. Mechanical & Indus. Technicians, Inc.
...without first seeking and obtaining an order from the court requiring an answer to interrogatories. Lewis v. Illinois Employers Insurance Company, 590 S.W.2d 119, 120 (Tex.1979); Pearson Corp. v. Wichita Falls Boys Club, 633 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1982). Appellant also cites Phill......
-
Fiduciary Mortg. Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Irving
...cites Illinois Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau v. Lewis, 582 S.W.2d 242 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont), writ ref'd n.r.e., 590 S.W.2d 119 (Tex.1979), (per curiam), and Rainwater v. Haddox, 544 S.W.2d 729 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1976, no writ), in support of this argument. These cases do not sta......