Lewis v. Independent School Dist.
Decision Date | 23 January 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 3769.,3769. |
Citation | 147 S.W.2d 298 |
Parties | LEWIS v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. OF CITY OF AUSTIN et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Travis County Court; Geo. S. Matthews, Judge.
Action by C. H. Lewis against the Independent School District of the City of Austin and others for an injunction against purchase of a fire insurance policy by defendant district. From a judgment denying an injunction, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Hardy Hollers, of Austin, for appellant.
J. M. Patterson, Black, Graves & Stayton, and J. Harris Gardner, all of Austin, and Brown, Carlson, Kiefer & Kunke, of Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
The simple question presented by this appeal is whether appellee, the Independent School District of the City of Austin, incorporated under the laws of this state as an independent school district, with the statutory board of trustees and other officers, can legally purchase and hold the policy of fire insurance issued to it by the Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company, legally incorporated under the laws of Texas. The action is by appellant, C. H. Lewis, in his capacity of a tax paying citizen, a resident of the School District, to enjoin appellee from consummating the purchase of the insurance policy. The amount of the policy premium was $264; the insurance policy had been issued and delivered to the school district, but the premium had not been paid. On trial to the court without a jury, on an agreed statement of facts, judgment was rendered denying appellant's prayer, from which he prosecuted his appeal to the Austin Court of Civil Appeals. The case is on our docket by order of transfer by the Supreme Court.
Appellee, the School District, contracted for this policy of insurance under the provisions of article 4860a—8, Vernon's Ann. Civ.St.: Clearly, under the provisions of this statute the School District had the right to contract with the Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company for the policy in issue. Appellant recognizes this as a proper construction of article 4860a—8, but it is his contention that this article of the statute contravenes the following provisions of our State Constitution: Vernon's Ann.St. Sec. 3 of Art. 11: "No county, city, or other municipal corporation shall hereafter become a subscriber to the capital of any private corporation or association, or make any appropriation or donation to the same, or in anywise loan its credit; but this shall not be construed to in any way affect any obligation heretofore undertaken pursuant to law." Section 52 of Art. 3: "The Legislature shall have no power to authorize any county, city, town or other political corporation or subdivision of the State to lend its credit or to grant public money or thing of value in aid of, or to any individual, association or corporation whatsoever, or to become a stockholder in such corporation, association or company."
The courts will not strike down as unconstitutional an act of the Legislature unless the Constitution, considered in the light of the facts of the case at bar, clearly forbids what the Legislature had done. Texas National Guard Armory Board v. McCraw, Attorney General, 132 Tex. 613, 126 S.W.2d 627.
We take the following summary of the controlling facts from appellees' brief:
On the following propositions, pertinent to the facts of this case, Article 4860a—8 is not unconstitutional:
(1) By purchasing the policy of fire insurance and by contracting to pay the premium in the amount of $264, the School District did not make a loan of its credit to the Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company. Unless prohibited by statute, mutual insurance companies may issue policies of fire insurance for a cash premium only, without contingent liability attaching to the policyholder. Union Ins. Co. v. Hoge, 1858, 21 How. 35, 62 U.S. 35, 16 L.Ed 61; McMahon v. Cooney, 1933, 95 Mont. 138, 25 P.2d 131; Spruance v. Farmers' & Merchants' Ins. Co., 1886, 9 Colo. 73, 10 P. 285; Patrons' Mut. F. Ins. Co. v. Brinker, 1926, 236 Mich. 367, 210 N.W. 329; State v. Manufacturers' Mut....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lewis v. Independent School Dist. of City of Austin
...From an adverse judgment, the plaintiff appeals to the Court of Civil Appeals. To review a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, 147 S.W.2d 298, affirming the judgment, the plaintiff brings Judgments of the Trial Court and of the Court of Civil Appeals reversed, and cause remanded with in......