Lewis v. State

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtRICE, J.
CitationLewis v. State, 22 Ala.App. 108, 113 So. 88 (Ala. App. 1927)
Decision Date17 May 1927
Docket Number6 Div. 186
PartiesLEWIS v. STATE.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; H.P. Heflin, Judge.

Phillip Lewis was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals. Affirmed.

G.C Boner, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

RICE J.

Appellant was indicted for the offense of murder in the first degree tried, and convicted of the offense of manslaughter in the first degree. His punishment was fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of ten years.

All the evidence tended to show that defendant killed the deceased by a shot from a pistol, which shot was aimed at or for one Flennoy, with whom defendant was engaged in a difficulty. This being the case, defendant's guilt or innocence is to be determined solely on the proposition of whether or not he would have been blameless had the shot killed Flennoy, for whom it was intended. Gilbert v. State, 20 Ala.App 28, 100 So. 566.

The trial court's full and comprehensive oral charge was based, pertinently, on this principle, and the same, in connection with the numerous written charges given at appellant's request, seems to cover every phase of the law applicable. This in itself is a sufficient justification for the refusal of each of the written charges which stated a correct proposition of applicable law indorsed "Refused" in the record.

The trial court fully cured in his oral charge any error he may...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Gettings v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1947
    ... ... innocence would be determinable on the inquiry, whether or ... not the defendant would have been justified and excusable in ... his act had he shot and killed James King, the person for ... whom his fire was intended. Winton v. State, 229 ... Ala. 642, 159 So. 62; Lewis v. State, 22 Ala.App ... 108, 113 So. 88; Bush v. State, 23 Ala.App. 502, 127 ... Appellant ... had full benefit of these familiar principles in the trial ... judge's able oral charge ... Objections were interposed to the introduction of the alleged ... dying ... ...
  • Ellington v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 26, 1973
    ...44 Ala.App. 331, 208 So.2d 241; Fleming v. State, 20 Ala.App. 481, 104 So. 137, cert. denied 213 Ala. 78, 104 So. 139; Lewis v. State, 22 Ala.App. 108, 113 So. 88; Riley v. State, 21 Ala.App. 655, 111 So. The record in this case shows that the list of jurors to be summoned consisted of the ......
  • Asbill v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 7, 1980
    ...to disregard the confrontation between the court and defense attorney and polled the jury on that instruction. Cf.: Lewis v. State, 22 Ala.App. 108, 113 So. 88 (1927) (wherein oral charge to jury cured error of court's criticism of The record does not support appellant's contention that pre......
  • Mathis v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • September 9, 1986
    ...is to be determined as if the accused had injured his intended victim. Gilbert v. State, 20 Ala.App. 28, 100 So. 566; Lewis v. State, 22 Ala.App. 108, 113 So. 88." Bradberry v. State, 37 Ala.App. 327, 67 So.2d 561, 564 (1953). "Not only is intent transferred, but also the degree of the crim......
  • Get Started for Free