Lewis v. State

Decision Date12 September 1944
CourtFlorida Supreme Court
PartiesLEWIS v. STATE.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; E. C. Welch, judge.

John D. Trammell, of Blountstown, for appellant.

J. Tom Watson, Atty. Gen., and John C. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ADAMS, Justice.

Appellant was charged with breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a misdemeanor, towit, an assault and battery.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged.

The only question presentd by this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence. We have carefully considered the entire record and find the evidence sufficiently convincing to sustain the verdict which was also approved by the trial judge.

Of our own motion however we will consider the legality of the sentence because we will not approve a judgment which is patently erroneous. As stated above the charge was breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. The verdict was regular in that it found guilt as charged. The judgment of conviction is, 'You, Edgar Lewis, having been convicted by a jury of the crime of Burglary, the Court adjudges you to be guilty.' No doubt the busy trial judge was misled by the style of 'burglary' upon the information. It was misleading but wholly superfluous inasmuch as the charging part of the information was proper.

It follows that the verdict is good and the judgment is erroneous. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a proper adjudication of guilt and sentence.

Reversed.

BUFORD, C. J., and TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Streeter v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 13, 1982
    ...(Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Williams v. State, 280 So.2d 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), which is subject to our review ex mero motu, Lewis v. State, 154 Fla. 825, 19 So.2d 199 (1944), and which if patent on the record before us can be corrected on this appeal. Robbins v. State, supra; Gonzalez v. State, U......
  • Perkins v. Mayo
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 13, 1957
    ...195 So. 569. The judgment of guilty by the trial court must conform to verdict. Holloman v. State, 140 Fla. 59, 191 So. 36; Lewis v. State, 154 Fla. 825, 19 So.2d 199. It is not inappropriate to point out that a judgment of guilt must conform to the offense for which a plea of guilty was pr......
  • Boutwell v. State, 92-2206
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 24, 1993
    ...the actual text asserted only misdemeanor language. Captions are surplusage and irrelevant to what has been charged. Lewis v. State, 154 Fla. 825, 19 So.2d 199 (1944). Equally, we reject the contention that the amendment should be accepted because the original misdemeanor text was a "scrive......
  • Lopez v. State, 82-631
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 4, 1985
    ...cannot stand. The trial court's judgment must conform to the jury's verdict. Perkins v. Mayo, 92 So.2d 641 (Fla.1957); Lewis v. State, 154 Fla. 825, 19 So.2d 199 (1944); Starkes v. State, 438 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Anderson v. State, 338 So.2d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 3......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT