Lewis v. Wilkins
Decision Date | 31 January 1868 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | HENRY LEWIS and others v. E. W. WILKINS, Ex'r. |
Held further that, upon the death of the owner of the farm before the expiration of the two years, his share which accrued thereafter did not go to the devisees of the farm, but was included under a bequest to another, of “the crop, stock and farming utensils, and all other perishable property on said farm.”
The doctrine that rent follows the reversion applies in favor of devisees of the reversion, as well where it is directed to be sold and the proceeds divided amongst them, as where it is given specifically.
BILL, filed to Fall Term 1867 of the Court of Equity for NORTHAMPTON, and at that time set for hearing upon bill and answer, and transmitted to this Court.
The complainants were the children of Ellen Lewis deceased, and the children of William M. Wilkins deceased, by his second marriage, and the defendant was the executor of Edmund Wilkins deceased, late of the county of Northampton.
The testator died January 20th 1867, and by his will, which was afterwards duly proved, among other things devised certain lands called “ The Meadows, to be sold upon a credit, and the proceeds of the sale [together with the slaves on said farm] to be equally divided, one half to the children of my niece Ellen Lewis, and the other half to the children of my brother Dr. W. W. Wilkins by his second marriage.” By a subsequent clause he gave as follows, “I will the crop, stock and farming utensils and all other perishable and personal property, except the negro slaves, on said farm in the Meadows and the Peele lands in District No. 10 aforesaid, and the proceeds of said sales of all said crop, stock and perishable and personal property in said District No 10, except the negro slaves as aforesaid in District No. 10, together with all debts due me and money deposited and all my Rail Road Co. bonds and stocks after paying all just debts, I give and bequeath to my said nephew F. W. Wilkins, whom I hereby appoint my whole and sole executor of this my last will and testament, this 19th day of August 1861.”
On the 1st of January 1866 the testator entered into the following contract with one Thomas C. Parker:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wagner v. Buttles
... ... James, 137 N. W. 1094, and cases cited). Some courts hold that agreements of the kind here involved make the parties thereto copartners. Lewis v. Wilkins, 62 N. C. 303;Thornton v. Barber, 48 App. Div. 298, 62 N. Y. Supp. 527;Leavitt v. Windsor L. & I. Co., 54 Fed. 439, 4 C. C. A. 425;Bank of ... ...
-
Keith v. Lee
...be held a partner of the lessee.' It is true that before this statute was enacted the Supreme Court did hold in the case of Lewis v. Wilkins, 1867, 62 N.C. 303, on which appellees rely, that a relationship such as is here involved was an agricultural partnership, and that decision was follo......