Lewison v. State
| Decision Date | 20 December 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 662,662 |
| Citation | 193 So.2d 53 |
| Parties | Robert J. LEWISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert J. Lewison in pro. per. and Thomas B. DeWolf of Helliwell, Melrose & DeWolf, Miami, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vero Beach, and Herbert P. Benn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.
LILES, WOODIE A., Associate Judge.
Appellant, defendant below, appeals an order rendered by the Juvenile Court of Broward County adjudging him to be in indirect criminal contempt of that court.
The minor child of Wanda Belle Shaw had been found to be a dependent child within the meaning of Chapter 39, Fla. Stats., F.S.A., by the Juvenile Court of Broward County. By an order entered by that court on December 21, 1964, Mrs. Shaw, the child's natural mother, was granted temporary custody. Mrs. Shaw subsequently moved to Dade County and instituted divorce proceedings against her husband in the Circuit Court for Dade County. Appellant, an attorney at law, represented Mrs. Shaw in her divorce action. The Final Decree entered by the Circuit Court on January 15, 1965, granted Mrs. Shaw full custody and control of the minor child. The Circuit Court then transferred that portion of the Final Decree pertaining to custody to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Dade County.
Thereafter, Mrs. Shaw placed the child in the home of Mr. and Mrs. Carl Cochran who, on October 29, 1965, filed a petition in the Circuit Court for Dade County to adopt the child. Appellant represents the Cochrans in this matter. Subsequent to the commencement of the adoption proceedings in Dade County, the Juvenile Court of Broward County issued a Rule to Show Cause directed to Mrs. Shaw and set the hearing thereon for December 17, 1965. Prior to the hearing, on December 13, 1965, the Juvenile Court of Broward County issued a 'Hold in Custody Order' ordering the child to be taken into custody. The child was taken from the Cochran home, returned to Broward County and placed in the temporary custody of the Child Welfare Services division of the Florida Department of Public Welfare.
Appellant-attorney then applied for relief to the Circuit Court for Dade County where the adoption proceedings were pending. That court, on December 22, 1965, entered an order giving the Cochrans temporary custody of the child and directing that the child be brought to Dade County. The child was thus returned to the Cochrans.
The Juvenile Court of Broward County, on December 28, 1965, found defendant to be in indirect criminal contempt of that court for 'causing to be issued' the Circuit Court order of December 22, 1965. The Juvenile Court's contempt order stated, among other things, that:
'* * * (S)aid Order of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Dade County, Florida dated December 22, 1965 has caused a conflict between that Honorable Court and the Juvenile Court of Broward County, Florida; FURTHER, that said Order has had the effect of considerably lessening the authority and dignity of this Court; FURTHER, that the acts and conduct of ROBERT J. LEWISON, ESQ. in securing said Order * * * were such that might have been reasonably calculated as being directed against the authority and dignity of this Court and having a reasonable tendency to degrade and embarrass the Judge thereof; FURTHER, that such uncalled for acts and/or wrongful conduct of ROBERT J. LEWISON, ESQ. were such as to amount to an indirect, if not actual, obstruction to and interference with the administration of justice in the cause presently pending before this Court. * * *'
Appellant has appealed, arguing that the Juvenile Court of Broward County lost jurisdiction of the case by the entry of the Final Decree of divorce and the transfer provision to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Dade County, and thus his action could not constitute contempt of court.
Questions as to the proper area of juvenile court jurisdiction have been the subject of numerous appellate decisions since these courts were created, and it is not likely that these questions will decrease in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Petition of Beggiani
...distinct statutory proceedings neither connected with nor controlled by the prior custody awards of another court. Lewison v. State, 193 So.2d 53 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1966). Even though a juvenile court may have obtained and retained jurisdiction over a custody case by an initial adjudication o......
-
M.A.S. v. Miss. Dep't of Human Servs. (In re M.A.S.)
...distinct statutory proceedings neither connected with nor controlled by the prior custody awards of another court. Lewison v. State , 193 So.2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966). Even though a juvenile court may have obtained and retained jurisdiction over a custody case by an initial adjudicat......
-
Lee v. Kepler
...in Dade County which had dealt with the custody of the child. In re DeWalt's Adoption, Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 915; Lewison v. State, Fla.App.1966, 193 So.2d 53. The parental rights which the step-mother gained through adoption are not subject to be controlled or affected by prior orders fo......
-
Olds v. State, 74--132
...of justice that lawyers be able to make honest good-faith efforts to present their clients' cases.' Id. See Lewison v. State, 193 So.2d 53 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1966): 'In the instant case, appellant had a perfect right to seek the available remedies to protect the interests of his clients, and hi......