Lido Intern., Inc. v. Lambeth

Decision Date28 January 1981
Docket NumberNo. B-9636,B-9636
Citation611 S.W.2d 622
PartiesLIDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al. v. Jerrel LAMBETH et ux.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Warren E. Zimmerman, Dallas, for petitioners.

William F. Billings and James L. Schutza, Dallas, for respondents.

BARROW, Justice.

Abbas Ghanei, an Iranian national, and Lido International, Inc., a Texas corporation in which Ghanei is the sole stockholder, 1 brought this suit against Jerrel Lambeth and wife to vacate and set aside a foreclosure sale of commercial real estate by Lambeth on July 3, 1979. Ghanei sued Houston Irvine Industrials, Inc. also and alleged that his default on the note was caused by Houston Irvine's breach of a lease agreement of the subject property. The trial court granted Lambeth a take-nothing summary judgment and severed the claim by Ghanei against Houston Irvine. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 601 S.W.2d 112. We reverse the judgments of the lower courts and remand the cause to the trial court.

The proper rules for review of a summary judgment have been established by this Court. See Rule 165a, Tex.R.Civ.Proc.; Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, 531 S.W.2d 589 (Tex.1975); Great American R. Ins. Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co., 391 S.W.2d 41 (Tex.1965). Under these rules, the movant has the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In deciding whether or not there is a disputed material fact issue precluding summary judgment, all evidence and every reasonable inference therefrom favorable to the non-movant will be taken as true. After a review of the summary judgment record in this light, we hold that Lambeth failed to establish as a matter of law that notice of the foreclosure sale was given to Ghanei as required by Article 3810, Tex.R.Civ.Stat.Ann.

The following facts are contained in the affidavit of Ghanei which was filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. On August 24, 1977, Ghanei purchased the real property involved here from Lambeth for the sum of $350,000. Ghanei paid $50,000 down, and secured the balance by a promissory note and deed of trust. Monthly payments were regularly made on this note as required until April 1979. In February of 1979, the property was leased by Ghanei to Houston Irvine for a ten year period. The monthly lease payments were equal to the amount of the payments required to be made monthly on the note.

On March 9, 1979, Ghanei personally visited Lambeth at the latter's office. Ghanei informed Lambeth that because of the revolution in Iran it was necessary that he return to protect his family and property and that he might be gone from six to nine months. In order to make the monthly payments on the note, Ghanei delivered nine post-dated checks to Lambeth. Lambeth was advised that these checks would be covered by the monthly lease payments from Houston Irvine. Ghanei gave to Lambeth an address and telephone number in Iran where he could be reached in the event any question came up regarding the property. Ghanei also gave Lambeth the Dallas address of the interpreter who was with Ghanei in Lambeth's office. Ghanei then left for Iran and did not return until July 5, 1979.

Houston Irvine failed to make its agreed monthly lease payment in April 1979; because of this, the April check of Ghanei was dishonored when presented to the bank by Lambeth. Thereafter, Lambeth instructed the trustee under the deed of trust to accelerate the note and sell the property at a foreclosure sale on July 3, 1979. The record is uncontroverted that the only notice sent to Ghanei regarding this foreclosure was addressed to the Dallas...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Savers Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Reetz
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 30 Noviembre 1989
    ...... Id. at 1225. See also C.F. Dahlberg & Co., Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., 836 F.2d 915, 920 (5th Cir.1988) ("[T]he opponent ... sale without the required twenty-one days' notice is invalid or void, Lido Int'l v. Lambeth, 611 S.W.2d 622 (Tex.1981); Phipps v. Fuqua, 32 S.W.2d ......
  • Murphy v. HSBC Bank U.S. for the Wells Fargo Asset Sec. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 30 Enero 2017
    ...... Anderson v . Liberty Lobby , Inc ., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986).         Where the nonmovant bears the ... the statutory notices and other requirements of a non-judicial sale, Lido Inter ., Inc . v . Lambeth , 611 S.W. 2d 622 (Tex. 1981); and . . . no ......
  • Miller v. Homecomings Fin., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 8 Agosto 2012
    ...of trust ( id.); non-compliance with the statutory notices and other requirements for a non-judicial sale, Lido Intern., Inc. v. Lambeth, 611 S.W.2d 622 (Tex.1981); and, most significantly for the present case, no “contractual standing” by the party seeking to foreclose, Martin, 377 S.W.3d ......
  • Sam v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 20 Mayo 2016
    ...... Id . at 5. After a "bidding war," Kafi, Inc. ("Kafi") paid $121,000.00 and was the winning bidder. 5 Id . Plaintiff ...Tex. Mar. 9, 2012) (citing Lido Intern ., Inc . v . Lambeth , 611 S.W.2d 622, 624 (Tex. 1981); Shearer ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT