Life Sav. and Loan Ass'n of America v. Bryant
Decision Date | 17 May 1984 |
Docket Number | No. 83-1145,83-1145 |
Citation | 467 N.E.2d 277,81 Ill.Dec. 577,125 Ill.App.3d 1012 |
Parties | , 81 Ill.Dec. 577 LIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam BRYANT and Ruth Bryant, Defendants-Appellants. |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
William R. Yowell, Chicago, for plaintiff-appellee.
Defendants, Adam and Ruth Bryant, entered into a contract with Katrina, Inc. for the purchase of property in Cook County, Illinois. Defendants paid an earnest money deposit and began making payments to Katrina, which did not hold legal title at the time the contract was entered into. Katrina subsequently executed a mortgage on the property in favor of plaintiff, Life Savings and Loan Association of America, and obtained legal title from the trustee.
Katrina was dissolved, and defendants continued to make mortgage payments to be credited against the balance of their contract price. Upon paying off the contract, defendants ceased making mortgage payments, and plaintiff brought foreclosure proceedings. Defendants counterclaimed to quiet title, asserting priority over the mortgage.
The trial court dismissed the counterclaim, finding that the mortgage was superior. Defendants now appeal.
We reverse the decision of the trial court.
On or about December 20, 1965, Adam and Ruth Bryant (Bryants or Vendees) entered into a real estate sale contract with Katrina, Inc. (Katrina or Vendor) to purchase property in Cook County, Illinois. The contract called for a $1,000 earnest money deposit on a total purchase price of $15,500 but contained no payment schedule for the balance owing. The contract did, however, contain the following provisions:
"This contract is subject to Katrina Inc. [sic] ability to purchase the above above mention [sic] property and also obtain a mortgage in the amount of $13,500.00 * * * in the event said mortgage cannot be obtain [sic] with in [sic] 45 days from date of contract then this contract becomes null and void and earnest money returned to purchaser."
* * *
* * * "In case of default of Martgage [sic] payment by Katrina, Inc. to mortgage Co. purchaser may make said mortgage payment out of contract payment and recieve [sic] credit for same on contract payment."
Katrina did not hold legal title at the time the contract was entered into and obtained neither title nor a mortgage within the 45 day period. With knowledge of these facts, the Bryants began making payments under the contract and entered into possession of the property on January 29, 1966. The Bryants continued in open and notorious possession of the property up to and through January 30, 1967, at which time Katrina executed a mortgage with Life Savings and Loan Association of America (Life or Mortgagee) in the amount of $12,000 and, with the proceeds thereof, obtained legal title by deed from Oak Park Savings Bank, as trustee. The Bryants never expressly assumed the mortgage, nor did they join in its making. Life had notice of the Bryants interest in and possession of the subject property at the time it obtained the mortgage from Katrina.
On December 11, 1968, Katrina was dissolved. The Bryants, who had been making mortgage payments on Katrina's behalf prior to the date of dissolution, continued to make payments through October 22, 1981 whereupon, alleging to have paid all amounts due under the purchase contract, the Bryants ceased making mortgage payments, leaving an outstanding balance on the mortgage of $1,254.68. Finding Katrina in default, Life elected to accelerate all sums due under the mortgage and instituted a foreclosure action, naming, among others, the Bryants as defendants.
The Bryants filed an Answer with affirmative defenses and a counterclaim to quiet title. In response, Life filed a motion to dismiss, which the trial court granted. In its order of March 9, 1983, the lower court found that the purchase contract contemplated obtaining the mortgage and that the Bryants had therefore subordinated their interest in the subject property to the mortgage. The court ordered that the counterclaim, to the extent that is asserted priority over the mortgage, be dismissed along with the affirmative defenses. That part of the counterclaim seeking to quiet title was let stand. The Bryants filed a motion to vacate the March 9, 1983 order and in denying that motion, the trial court found that there was no just reason for delaying enforcement or appeal thereof. This appeal followed.
OPINIONThe single issue before this reviewing court is whether the trial court's finding that the Bryants' interest is subordinate to the mortgage was correct. Two questions are involved in making this determination, namely, (1) what is the nature of the Bryants' interest in the subject property, and (2) does that interest take priority over the mortgage subsequently executed in favor of Life. The answer to these questions lies within the doctrine of equitable conversion and the applicable recording law in Illinois.
25 Ill.2d 447, 449, 185 N.E.2d 218.
In Shay, as here, one party contended that equitable conversion did not apply to a long term contract for the sale of real estate prior to the time both parties fulfilled any conditions precedent to the contract. The court dismissed this contention, holding that the correct view is that equitable conversion takes place at the instant a valid and enforceable contract is entered into and that the buyer at the time acquires an equitable title. (Shay v. Penrose (1962), 25 Ill.2d 447, 185 N.E.2d 218.) Between vendor and vendee, equity regards the vendee as the owner of the land upon execution of the purchase contract. Rosewood Corp. v. Fisher (1970), 46 Ill.2d 249, 263 N.E.2d 833.
Applying the doctrine of equitable conversion to the facts of the instant case, we note that the Bryants, as Vendees, became the equitable owners of the property on December 20, 1965, the date on which they executed the purchase contract with Katrina.
Under this doctrine, the prior conveyance results in the acquisition of equitable title by the vendee such that after-acquired title does not inure to the benefit of a subsequent mortgagee who cannot, by the taking of a mortgage, enlarge the bare legal interest given to him by the mortgagor. Cooper v. Robinson (1922), 302 Ill. 181, 134 N.E. 119.
In the present case, Katrina acquired title subsequent to the conveyance to the vendees. The validity of the sales contract was not impaired by Katrina's not having title at the time the contract was executed. (Madigan v. Buehr (1970), 125 Ill.App.2d 8, 260 N.E.2d 431.) Under the doctrine of after-acquired title, the condition...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Washington Mut. Bank v. Homan
...... 974 A.2d 382 . loan of $625,000 to Moriarty, which was secured by a .... See also Life Sav. & Loan Assoc. of Am. v. Bryant, 125 ......
-
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Villasenor
...in the property." In re Ehrlich, 59 B.R. 646, 650 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1986) (citing Life Savings & Loan Ass'n of America v. Bryant, 125 Ill.App.3d 1012, 1019, 81 Ill.Dec. 577, 467 N.E.2d 277 (1984) ). If U.S. Bank meets these requirements it would obtain the role of a bona fide mortgagee. In the......
-
Application for Judgment and Sale of Delinquent Properties for Tax Year 1989, In re
...... See Life Savings & Loan Association of America v. Bryant ......
-
Estate of Martinek, Matter of
...... executed a will in which he devised a life estate in the subject property to his wife, ...290, 293, 90 N.E.2d 735; Life Savings & Loan Association of America v. Bryant (1984), 125 ......