Lightfoot v. King
Decision Date | 11 March 1920 |
Docket Number | (No. 11046.) |
Citation | 25 Ga.App. 80,102 S.E. 468 |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Parties | T. J. & W. R. LIGHTFOOT . v. KING et al. |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; J. T. Pendleton, Judge.
Action by P. G. King and others against T. J. & W. R. Lightfoot, a partnership doing business under the name of "Lightfoot Business Opportunities." Directed verdict for plaintiffs, certiorari overruled, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.
Robt. C. & Philip H. Alston and Blair Foster, all of Atlanta, for plaintiffs in error.
Weltner & Cheatham, of Atlanta, for defendants in error.
SMITH, J. Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brack v. Brownlee
...(1973); Brady v. Poulos, 121 Ga.App. 35, 172 S.E.2d 437 (1970); Cole v. Cutler, 96 Ga.App. 891, 102 S.E.2d 82 (1958); Lightfoot v. King, 25 Ga.App. 80, 102 S.E. 468 (1925).2 While overruled by this case, the cases cited in footnote 1, supra, lack legal vitality at least as applied to ancill......
-
Dell v. Kugel
...C. Dell, Jr., for the $1,500 alleged to have been deposited with him (Rogers v. Durrence, 10 Ga.App. 657, 73 S.E. 1083; Lightfoot v. King, 25 Ga.App. 80(2), 102 S.E. 468; Scarborough v. Novak, 92 Ga.App. 488, 88 S.E.2d 800), and showed the right of the plaintiffs to recover of Swims, Willia......
-
Morgan v. Hemphill
...123 Ga. 415, 51 S.E. 410; O'Rear v. Lamb, 194 Ga. 455, 22 S.E.2d 74; Stanaland v. Stephens, 78 Ga.App. 68, 50 S.E.2d 258; Lightfoot v. King, 25 Ga.App. 80, 102 S.E. 468; Aycock Realty Co. v. brown, 39 Ga.App. 649, 148 S.E. 291; Cole v. Cutler, 96 Ga.App. 891, 102 S.E.2d 82; Southeastern Rea......
-
Williams v. Gottlieb
...258; Brown v. White, 73 Ga.App. 524, 37 S.E.2d 213; Southeastern Realty Co. v. Griffin, 38 Ga.App. 220, 143 S.E. 435; Lightfoot v. King, 25 Ga.App. 80, 102 S.E. 468. 2. The cases of Gray & Co. v. McDaniel, 73 Ga. 118, and McDaniel v. Gray & Co., 69 Ga. 433 are not applicable to the instant ......