Linton v. Nawaz

Citation900 N.Y.S.2d 239,926 N.E.2d 593,14 N.Y.3d 821
PartiesJohn R. LINTON, et al., Respondents, v. Muhammad NAWAZ, et al., Appellants.
Decision Date06 April 2010
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Baker, McEvoy, Morissey & Moskovits, P.C., New York City (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants.

Law Offices of Mark S. Gray, New York City (Peter J. Eliopoulos of counsel), for respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

In this personal injury case in which a taxi struck the plaintiff, the evidence plaintiff proffered relating to injuries to his right shoulder and lumbosacral spine raised a triable question of fact as to whether he suffered a serious injury that was causally related to the accident under the permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member and/or significant limitation of a body function or system criteria ( see Insurance Law § 5102 [d] ). Since plaintiff established that at least some of his injuries meet the "No Fault" threshold, it is unnecessary to address whether his proof with respect to other injuries he allegedly sustained would have been sufficient to withstand defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.

To continue reading

Request your trial
102 cases
  • Vaughan v. Leon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 26, 2012
    ...at 482, 915 N.Y.S.2d 529; Linton v. Nawaz, 62 A.D.3d 434, 439–440, 879 N.Y.S.2d 82 [2009], affd. on other grounds 14 N.Y.3d 821, 900 N.Y.S.2d 239, 926 N.E.2d 593 [2010] ). Although “[a] factfinder could of course reject this opinion” ( Perl v. Meher, 18 N.Y.3d 208, 219, 936 N.Y.S.2d 655, 96......
  • Ciani v. Botta
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • October 2, 2020
    ... ... other injuries he allegedly sustained would have been ... sufficient to withstand defendant's motion for summary ... judgment" (Linton v Nawaz, 14 N.Y.3d ... 821, 822, 900 N.Y.S.2d 239 [2010]; see Rubin v SMS Taxi ... Corp., 71 A.D.3d 548, 898 N.Y.S.2d 110 [1st Dept 2010]) ... ...
  • Turcios-Rodriguez v. Velasquez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 17, 2018
    ...other injuries he allegedly sustained would have been sufficient to withstand defendant's motion for summary judgment" (Linton v Nawaz, 14 N.Y.3d 821, 822, 900 N.Y.S.2d 239 [2010]; see Rubin v SMS Taxi Corp., 71 A.D.3d 548, 898 N.Y.S.2d 110 [1st Dept 2010]). Accordingly, defendant's motion ......
  • Romero v. Hill
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 27, 2020
    ... ... right wrist and is not obliged to do more to overcome ... defendant Hill's motion for summary judgment (see ... e.g. Linton v Nawaz, 14 N.Y.3d 821, 900 N.Y.S.2d 239 [2d ... Dept 2010]; Jilani v Palmer, 83 A.D.3d 786, 920 ... N.Y.S.2d 424 [2d Dept 2011]; Harris ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT