Linville v. Greer
Decision Date | 26 November 1901 |
Citation | 165 Mo. 380,65 S.W. 579 |
Parties | LINVILLE v. GREER et ux. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Clay county; E. J. Broaddus, Judge.
Action by Jennie Linville against Robert A. Greer and wife. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
This is an action of ejectment for the possession of lots 14 and 15 of Independence Avenue addition to Kansas City, Mo. The petition is in the usual form in such cases, and the answer a general denial, and a plea of the 10-years statute of limitations. Plaintiff replied to the answer, denying all allegations therein, and also alleging that one of the deeds in defendant's supposed chain of title, claimed to have been executed by James J. Priddy and Nancy A. Priddy and Elizabeth Jones, was executed when Nancy A. Priddy was, and ever since has been, the wife of James J. Priddy, and that at that time both Nancy A. Priddy and Elizabeth Jones were minors, under lawful age. The case was tried by the court, a jury being waived. The trial resulted in a judgment for defendants, from which plaintiff, after unsuccessful motion for a new trial, appeals.
Both parties claim under one Thomas Jones,—the plaintiff by deed from one of his grandchildren, and the defendant by mesne conveyances. Plaintiff testified that her mother's name was Elizabeth F. Jones, who married W. P. Linville in the year 1854; that they had five children; that her mother moved to California in May, 1853, with her sister, Mrs. Priddy, and husband, and died there in November, 1892; that neither her mother nor Mrs. Priddy ever returned to Missouri; that Mrs. Priddy had six children, the first one being born in 1852; that Mrs. Linville's first child was born in 1856; that George W. Priddy is a son of Nancy Priddy, whose mother, Nancy, died in 1892; that her husband, James J. Priddy, died in 1896, and that her father is still living; that her mother was 17 years old when she went to California; had often heard Mrs. Priddy say so; that Mrs. Priddy left four children, her heirs at law, living at the time of her death, and Mrs. Linville five at the time of her death. Mattie Linville testified substantially to the same effect.
In addition to this evidence, the case was submitted upon the following agreed statement of facts:
It is also agreed that on August 31, 1887, Nancy Priddy and James J. Priddy, her husband, the makers of the deed acknowledged before Gregory as mayor of Kansas City, executed and delivered to S. P. Forsee a power of attorney which asserted ownership of said property, and authorized and directed said Forsee to bring suit for the makers of said deed to recover said makers' interests in all the property belonging to Thomas Jones at his death, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jenkins v. John Taylor Dry Goods Co.
...and in favor of the lessee; and in any event avoiding exaction by lessor of any forfeiture. Grooms v. Morrison, 249 Mo. 544; Linville v. Greer, 165 Mo. 380; Patterson v. Butterfield, 221 N.W. 293; Wright v. Barron, 232 S.W. 1088; Henry v. Excelsior,, 277 Mo. 508; Gray v. Conrad, 101 Mo. 331......
-
Bullock v. Peoples Bank of Holcomb
...estates and where there is doubt as to whether remainder is vested or contingent, courts will construe it as a vested estate. Linville v. Grear, 165 Mo. 380; Green v. Irvin, 274 S.W. 684; Chew Keller, 100 Mo. 362; Heady v. Hollman, 251 Mo. 632. (9) A vested remainder is a vested interest to......
-
Howell v. Sherwood
... ... secure the same in presenti then the instrument is a deed, ... and conveys legal title. Linville v. Greer, 165 Mo ... 380; McKinney v. Settler, 31 Mo. 541; Devlin on ... Deeds (2 Ed.), secs. 174, 211; Long v. Wagoner, 47 ... Mo. 178; ... ...
-
In re Franz' Estate
... ... Pierce, 7 Mass. 381; Havens v. Sea ... Shore Land Co., 47 N.J.Eq. 365, 20 A. 497; Lynch v ... Livingston, 6 N.Y. 422; Linville v. Greer, 165 ... Mo. 380, 65 S.W. 579; Grooms v. Morrison, 249 Mo ... 544, 155 S.W. 430; R. S. 1929, sec. 1723; Burt v. Second ... Natl ... ...