Litchfield v. Cox, 33

Decision Date02 March 1966
Docket NumberNo. 33,33
Citation146 S.E.2d 641,266 N.C. 622
PartiesClaude Davis LITCHFIELD v. William Harvey COX.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

John A. Wilkinson, by James R. Vosburgh, Washington, for plaintiff.

Aydlett & White, Elizabeth City, for defendant.

PLESS, Justice.

To establish a case against the defendant for alienation of his wife's affections, the law imposes upon the plaintiff, Litchfield, the burden of showing, by competent evidence, the following: '(1) That he and his wife were happily married, and that a genuine love and affection existed between them; (2) that the love and affection so existing was alienated and destroyed; (3) that the wrongful and malicious acts of the defendants produced and brought about the loss and alienation of such love and affection. Hankins v. Hankins, 202 N.C. 358, 162 S.E. 766.' Ridenhour v. Miller, 225 N.C. 543, 35 S.E.2d 611.

The mother of the plaintiff, Mrs. Bess Litchfield, testified that her son and his wife seemed to be fond of each other and it was just a happy family. The plaintiff testified 'We had a happy home. She seemed to love the children and to love me. * * * In 1962 and 1963 she became very cold. * * * She was casting me aside. * * * Things got worse as time went on.'

The defendant supplied the plaintiff's wife with liquor until she had a drinking problem. He wrote her that 'those nights were all so nice. * * * I could not pick the best of them as they were all so perfect. I wish I were able to put on these pages the satisfaction that it gives me to know that I care for you and of being reasonable sure that it is being returned. * * * I am waiting and loving you.'

The above excerpts from the plaintiff's evidence fully establish the three elements necessary to survive a motion for nonsuit. While it is true that the plaintiff and his 'alienated' wife are still living together that affects the credibility of his evidence, but it still remains a question for the jury.

Reversed.

MOORE, J., not sitting.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Stann v. Levine
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 7 Noviembre 2006
    ...McCutchen v. McCutchen, 360 N.C. 280, 283, 624 S.E.2d 620, 623 (2006) (alterations in original) (quoting Litchfield v. Cox, 266 N.C. 622, 623, 146 S.E.2d 641, 641 (1966)). McCutchen clarified that an alienation claim when the wrong is complete. The "wrong" in an alienation of affections cas......
  • McCutchen v. McCutchen
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • 3 Mayo 2005
    ...(4) the wrongful and malicious acts of the defendant caused the loss and alienation of such love and affection. Litchfield v. Cox, 266 N.C. 622, 623, 146 S.E.2d 641 (1966) (citations omitted). The second element of existing love and affection may be satisfied in less than stable marriages. ......
  • Ward v. Beaton
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 19 Diciembre 2000
    ...also testified Mr. Ward was a "good husband" to her and a "good father" to his children. (Tr. at 19.) See, e.g., Litchfield v. Cox, 266 N.C. 622, 623, 146 S.E.2d 641, 642 (1966) (holding plaintiff's own testimony that her marriage was a good one sufficient to establish a marriage with love ......
  • McCutchen v. McCutchen
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • 27 Enero 2006
    ...acts of the defendant[] produced and brought about the loss and alienation of such love and affection.'" Litchfield v. Cox, 266 N.C. 622, 623, 146 S.E.2d 641, 641 (1966) (citation omitted). Although the plaintiff must introduce evidence of a valid marriage, as well as marital love and affec......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT