Littel v. Hunnicutt, s. U--241

Decision Date14 March 1975
Docket NumberNos. U--241,U--242,s. U--241
PartiesMildred Rucker LITTEL In re Interest of Howard Dewayne Rucker, a minor, Appellant, v. Lena Belle HUNNICUTT, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Floyd G. Yeager, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Edwin J. Witten; Stanley B. Gelman, of Gelman & Figur; Claude L'Engle; and Russell W. Cummings, Jacksonville, for appellee.

McCORD, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying petition for change of custody of a minor child from appellee, the divorced wife of the child's paternal grandfather, to the child's paternal grandmother, appellant. After considering the briefs and record in the cause, we temporarily relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for its reconsideration of the evidence in the light of Van Meter v. Murphy, Fla.App. (1st), 287 So.2d 740, and directed that upon reconsideration, the trial court enter its further order. The trial court has now entered its supplemental order pursuant to the aforesaid directions and we have considered additional briefs and oral argument of counsel filed and made subsequent thereto. We are impressed with the findings and conclusions of the trial judge as to the best interests of the minor child. While the evidence is conflicting, the trial judge who heard the testimony was in a better position than are we to evaluate it and there is substantial evidence to support his findings and conclusions. As this court stated in Blain v. Blain, Fla.App. (1st), 214 So.2d 521:

'. . . It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.'

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C.J., and MILLS, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. Rabin
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 2, 1993
    ...10, 1977; Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Ates v. Yellow Pine Land Co., 310 So.2d 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Littel v. Hunnicutt, 310 So.2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); White v. White, 306 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Rolland v. Thompson, 305 So.2d 239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Cook v. Cook, 3......
  • Banco do Brasil, S.A. v. City Nat. Bank of Miami
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 1, 1992
    ...10, 1977; Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Ates v. Yellow Pine Land Co., 310 So.2d 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Littel v. Hunnicutt, 310 So.2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); White v. White, 306 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Rolland v. Thompson, 305 So.2d 239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Cook v. Cook, 3......
  • Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 28, 1977
    ...10, 1977; Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Ates v. Yellow Pine Land Co., 310 So.2d 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Littel v. Hunnicutt, 310 So.2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); White v. White, 306 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Rolland v. Thompson, 305 So.2d 239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Cook v. Cook, 3......
  • Rucker, In Interest of
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1975
    ...Rucker LITTEL, Petitioner, v. Lena Belle HUNNICUTT, Respondent. No. 47399. Supreme Court of Florida. Nov. 20, 1975. Certiorari denied. 310 So.2d 45. ADKINS, C.J., and ROBERTS, OVERTON, ENGLAND and SUNDBERG, JJ., ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT