Little v. Ennis
Decision Date | 12 January 1922 |
Docket Number | 2 Div. 773. |
Citation | 207 Ala. 111,92 So. 167 |
Parties | LITTLE v. ENNIS ET AL. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Sumpter County; R.I. Jones, Judge.
Bill by W. L. and J. B. Ennis, as executors of the last will and testament of Robert Ennis, deceased, against Lucille E Little and others, to interpret the will and to ascertain especially if certain items ought to be treated as advancements to Lucille E. Little and deducted from her portion of the estate, and to remove the administration from the probate to the circuit court. From a decree construing the will, and charging Lucille Little with advancements, she appeals. Affirmed in part, and reversed, rendered, and remanded.
Under Code 1907, § 2686, Acts 1919, p. 566, the executors may be compelled to make settlement in court though relieved from the duty of so doing by the will.
The will referred to is as follows:
The wife of the testator died in the lifetime of the testator, and he added a codicil to his will appointing W. L. Ennis and J. B. Ennis as executors, and adding other matters not here material.
The following are the exhibits:
Exhibit B.
Mobile, Ala., Nov. 16th, 1903.
For and in consideration of Robert W. Ennis having given us five thousand (5,000) dollars in cash we agree that this is to be a receipt for said amount to him to be deducted from our share of his estate after his death. We further agree to pay to Robert W. Ennis and Annie E. Ennis, his wife, one hundred and twenty (120) per annum, payable in sums of sixty (60)
dollars, semiannually, the first days of July and January of each year, so long as both or either of them live; the first payment of sixty (60) dollars to be the first day of July, 1904, the payments on this to cease after the death of said Robert W. Ennis and Annie E. Ennis.
Lucille E. Little.
J. R. Little.
9 years 295 day. Int. 1180.00. Interest paid in full up to 1st of July, 1906. Robt. W. Ennis, January 9, 1905. Interest...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Burnett's Estate, In re
...makes a will he will thereby provide against what he has advanced or may advance to the beneficiaries in the will. Little v. Ennis, 207 Ala. 111, 92 So. 167 (Sup.Ct.1922). In the case of Mecum v. Stoughton, 81 N.J.Eq. 319, at page 326, 86 A. 52, at page 55 (Ch.1913), the vice-chancellor sai......
-
Baldwin v. Branch
...Bank v. Nelson, 244 Ala. 374, 13 So.2d 765 (1943); First Nat'l Bank v. Hartwell, 232 Ala. 413, 168 So. 446 (1936); and Little v. Ennis, 207 Ala. 111, 92 So. 167 (1922). Claude's son also notes that" `[i]t was the rule at common law that a gift in trust lapsed upon the death of the beneficia......
-
Morgan County Nat. Bank of Decatur v. Nelson
... ... being under the influence of what is now section 16, Title ... 61, Code of 1940. Little v. Ennis, 207 Ala. 111, 92 ... So. 167; Caldwell v. Caldwell, 204 Ala. 161, 85 So ... 493; Johnson v. Holifield, 82 Ala. 123, 2 So. 753; ... ...
-
Park v. Whitfield
...them at the time of the making of the will. The question called for evidence competent, relevant, and material under the issues. Little v. Ennis, 207 Ala. 111, head note 5, 92 167; Gaither v. Phillips, 199 Ala. 695, 75 So. 295; Posey v. Donaldson, 189 Ala. 368, 66 So. 662; Eastis v. Montgom......