Little v. Kone, Inc.

Citation139 A.D.3d 678,31 N.Y.S.3d 147,2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 03475
Decision Date04 May 2016
Docket Number2015-07364, Index No. 17565/10.
PartiesMarna LITTLE, et al., respondents, v. KONE, INC., appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

139 A.D.3d 678
31 N.Y.S.3d 147
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 03475

Marna LITTLE, et al., respondents,
v.
KONE, INC., appellant.

2015-07364, Index No. 17565/10.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

May 4, 2016.


31 N.Y.S.3d 148

Ansa Assuncao, LLP, White Plains, NY (Thomas O. O'Connor of counsel), for appellant.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P. SHERI S. ROMAN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, and FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

139 A.D.3d 678

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pineda–Kirwan, J.), dated April 24, 2015, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

139 A.D.3d 679

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The injured plaintiff alleged that she was attempting to enter a freight elevator at her place of employment when she was struck on the head by its gate after its alarm bell and strobe light failed to activate to warn her that the gate was about to close. Thereafter, the injured plaintiff, and her husband suing derivatively, commenced this action against the defendant, the company retained to service and maintain the elevator. The Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We reverse.

“An elevator company which agrees to maintain an elevator in safe operating condition may be liable to a passenger for failure to correct conditions of which it has knowledge or failure to use reasonable care to discover and correct a condition which it ought to have found” (Rogers v. Dorchester Assoc., 32 N.Y.2d 553, 559, 347 N.Y.S.2d 22, 300 N.E.2d 403 ; see Reed v. Nouveau El. Indus., Inc., 123 A.D.3d 1102, 1103, 999 N.Y.S.2d 182 ; Papapietro

v. Kone, Inc., 123 A.D.3d 894, 895, 999 N.Y.S.2d 142 ; Tucci v. Starrett City, Inc., 97 A.D.3d 811, 812, 949 N.Y.S.2d 419 ). Here, the defendant submitted evidence sufficient to establish, prima facie, that it did not have actual or constructive notice of an ongoing condition that would have caused the elevator's gate to close without adequate warning (se...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Lanzillo v. 4 World Trade Ctr., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 23 Junio 2021
    ...of which it should have been aware (see Daconta v. Otis El. Co., 165 A.D.3d 753, 753–754, 85 N.Y.S.3d 528 ; Little v. Kone, Inc., 139 A.D.3d 678, 679, 31 N.Y.S.3d 147 ; Reed v. Nouveau El. Indus., Inc., 123 A.D.3d 1102, 1103, 999 N.Y.S.2d 182 ; Tucci v. Starrett City, Inc., 97 A.D.3d at 812......
  • Daconta v. Otis Elevator Co., 2016–02292
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 10 Octubre 2018
    ...found" ( 85 N.Y.S.3d 530 Rogers v. Dorchester Assoc., 32 N.Y.2d 553, 559, 347 N.Y.S.2d 22, 300 N.E.2d 403 ; see Little v. Kone, Inc., 139 A.D.3d 678, 679, 31 N.Y.S.3d 147 ). Here, the defendant submitted sufficient evidence to establish, prima facie, that it did not have actual or construct......
  • Hussey v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 1 Agosto 2018
    ...156 A.D.3d at 766, 68 N.Y.S.3d 100 ; Vilardi v. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc., 145 A.D.3d 711, 711, 42 N.Y.S.3d 336 ; Little v. Kone, Inc., 139 A.D.3d 678, 679, 31 N.Y.S.3d 147 ; Reed v. Nouveau El. Indus., Inc., 123 A.D.3d 1102, 1103, 999 N.Y.S.2d 182 ). The evidence in the record demonstrated ......
  • Palladino v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 26 Junio 2019
    ...A.D.3d 753, 754, 85 N.Y.S.3d 528 ; Goodwin v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 156 A.D.3d 765, 767, 68 N.Y.S.3d 100 ; Little v. Kone, Inc., 139 A.D.3d 678, 679, 31 N.Y.S.3d 147 ; Tucci v. Starrett City, Inc., 97 A.D.3d 811, 813, 949 N.Y.S.2d 419 ).Accordingly, we agree with the Supreme Court'......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT