Littlefield v. Superior Court

• Decision Date: 13 November 1979
• Citation: 160 Cal.Rptr. 175,98 Cal.App.3d 652
• Court: California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
• Parties: Wilbur F. LITTLEFIELD, Public Defender of Los Angeles County, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent, Jesus Arteaga HERRERA, Real Party in Interest, The COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Real Party in Interest. Civ. 57171.

Page 175

160 Cal.Rptr. 175

98 Cal.App.3d 652

Wilbur F. LITTLEFIELD, Public Defender of Los Angeles County, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent Jesus Arteaga HERRERA, Real Party in Interest The COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Real Party in Interest.

Civ. 57171.

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

Nov. 13, 1979.

Wilbur F. Littlefield, Public Defender, Dennis A. Fischer and John H. Scott, Deputy Public Defenders, Los Angeles, for petitioner

John K. Van De Kamp, Dist. Atty., Los Angeles, for respondent.

OPINION

LILLIE, Acting Presiding Justice.

Wilbur F. Littlefield, Public Defender of the County of Los Angeles, has filed petition for writ of mandate to compel respondent superior court to vacate its order of July 31, 1979, appointing the Public Defender of the County of Los Angeles as counsel for real party in interest Jesus Arteaga Herrera, defendant in a civil action brought pursuant to sections 11350.1 and 11475.1, Welfare and Institutions Code, in which real party in interest, County of Los Angeles, seeks to establish paternity of and enforce support for two minor children. Opposition was requested. Honorable Marvin A. Freeman, Judge of respondent Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, has filed letter brief opposing said petition; real party in interest County of Los Angeles, has filed letter brief advancing its position in this case but entering no opposition to said petition; real party in interest Jesus Arteaga Herrera has not appeared.

The petition for writ of mandate and all letter briefs have been read and considered by the court.

The petition raises two contentions: (1) defendant Jesus Arteaga Herrera is not entitled at public expense to representation in the civil action to establish paternity of and enforce support for minor children; and (2) there is no statutory authority for the appointment of the Public Defender of the County of Los Angeles to represent defendant Herrera in said action.

As there is not a plain, speedy or adequate remedy at law, and in view of the fact that the issuance of an alternative writ would add nothing to the full presentation already made and would only serve the purpose of delay, we deem this to be a proper case for the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate "in the first instance" (Code Civ.Proc., § 1088; Department of Consumer Affairs v. Superior Court, 71 Cal.App.3d 97, 99, 139 Cal.Rptr. 120.)

The record shows that a complaint for child support has been filed under the provisions of sections 11350.1 and 11475.1, Welfare and Institutions Code, by real party in interest, County of Los Angeles against Jesus Arteaga Herrera (No. D-991311), alleging he is the father of two minor children and praying for support of said minors;...