Litz v. Exch. Bank of Alva
Decision Date | 06 September 1905 |
Citation | 1905 OK 76,83 P. 790,15 Okla. 564 |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Parties | JAMES R. LITZ, Administrator of the Estate of JOHN R. COVEY, deceased v. THE EXCHANGE BANK OF ALVA. |
¶0 1. REAL PROPERTY--Mortgage Lien. A mortgage does not convey title to the mortgaged property, but only creates a lien thereon.
2. SAME--Right to Extinguish. A mortgagor has the right to pay the indebtedness secured by the mortgage, and extinguish the lien at any time before the property is sold by the mortgagee.
3. PERSONALTY-- Descends to Whom. Personal property of one who dies intestate passes to the heirs of such intestate, subject to the control of the probate court, and to the possession of any administrator appointed by the court for the purpose of administration.
4. SAME--Sale of, When Mortgaged. Where a person or corporation before the granting of letters of administration, sells or alienates any of the property of a decedent, which is covered by a chattel mortgage, he, or it, is chargeable therewith, and liable to an action by the administrator of the estate for double the value of the property so sold or alienated.
H. A. Noah, for plaintiff in error.
T. J. Womack and Strang & Devereux, for defendant in error.
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
On April 15th, 1895 John R. Covey executed and delivered his promissory note to the Exchange Bank of Alva, in the sum of $ 1451.40 due ninety days after date, and to secure the payment thereof executed a chattel mortgage to said bank upon one hundred and forty-seven head of cattle. On May 14, 1895, said John R. Covey was killed. On May 15, 1895, the bank proceeded to take possession of the cattle covered by said mortgage. On the 17th or 18th of May, 1895, the bank gave the statutory notice of the foreclosure of its mortgage, and on the 28th of May, 1895, the cattle covered by said mortgage were sold to one J. W. Maxey, for $ 632.10, being $ 4.30 per head. On May 29, 1895, there was a special administrator appointed by the probate court of Woods county. The decedent, John R. Covey, died intestate. This action was instituted against the Exchange Bank of Alva by the administrator of the estate of John R. Covey, to recover double the value of the property sold and alienated by the bank, the holder of said chattel mortgage, after the death of said Covey, and before a special or general administrator was appointed. The issues having been joined, the cause was submitted to the court, without a jury, upon the following agreed statement of facts:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Delfelder v. Poston, 1611
...statute was construed in Jahns v. Nolting, 29 Cal. 508, and that case was followed in Oklahoma. Aultman Co. v. Fuss, 207 P. 308; Litz v. Bank, (Okla.) 83 P. 790; Secrest Wood, 224 P. 349; 38 Cyc. 2024; Hodgson v. Hatfield, (Okla.) 240 P. 69; Bank v. Keller, (Okl.) 256 P. 34. The right of re......
-
Noble v. Ft. Smith Wholesale Grocery Co.
...and decisions the title to property covered by chattel mortgage passes until after default and foreclosure. ¶23 In Litz, Adm'r, v. Exchange Bank, 15 Okla. 564, 83 P. 790, it is said: "Under the provisions of our statute, a mortgage does not convey title to the property mortgaged, but only c......
-
Sauls v. Whitman
... ... She had $1,650.20 cash in the Bank of Commerce of McLoud, and received a pension check of $40 per month ... 27 In the early Oklahoma case of Litz, Adm'r, v. Exchange Bank of Alva, 15 Okla. 564, 83 P. 790, one Covey ... ...
-
Smith-Wogan Hardware & Imp. Co. v. Bice
...a chattel mortgage does not convey title to the mortgaged property, but only creates a lien. Comp. Laws 1909, sec. 4415; Litz v. Exchange Bank, 15 Okla. 564, 83 P. 790; Hixon v. Hubbell, 4 Okla. 224, 44 P. 222. In the states where a chattel mortgage does not vest title in the mortgagee, but......