Lively v. CIR, 83-1070.
| Citation | 705 F.2d 1017 |
| Decision Date | 02 May 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-1070.,83-1070. |
| Parties | Richard W. LIVELY and Veronica Lively, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit) |
Thomas J. Carley, Rockville Centre, N.Y., for appellants.
Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Paup, William S. Estabrook, Douglas G. Coulter, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 8, 1983.
Richard W. Lively and Veronica Lively filed a Form 1040 for the taxable year 1977 reflecting income of only $7,918. This amount was entered on the line for "business income" rather than on the line for "wages, salaries, tips, and other employee compensation." With the Form 1040, the Livelys filed Wage and Tax Statements showing that Richard had received $30,659.65 in wages during 1977. They also filed a Schedule C,1 which, after listing "receipts" of $31,360 and "subtractions" for personal expenses of $23,442, identified "net profit" of $7,918. The Commissioner sent the taxpayers a statutory notice determining a deficiency of $6,173 and a penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6653(a) of $308.65. The taxpayers filed a petition with the Tax Court, and that Court2 granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner. T.C. Memo. 1982-590. The taxpayers appeal. We affirm.
The taxpayers contend that the Tax Court erred in upholding the Commissioner's disallowance of their deductions, because they did not claim any deductions. While it is true that the taxpayers did not enter any amount for claimed deductions on the Form 1040, the "business income" reported on that form was calculated according to the Schedule C filed by the taxpayers, and it clearly included impermissible deductions for personal expenses. Moreover, in their petition, the taxpayers alleged that they "are entitled to deduct from gross income $23,442.00 or such greater or lesser amount as the Court may allow." Document 2 of the Record on Appeal, paragraph 5(e). The Tax Court did not err in this respect.
The taxpayers argue further that the income tax is unconstitutional because it is a direct tax which is not apportioned, that there is no law imposing an income tax on them for 1977, that 26 U.S.C. §§ 3101, 3102, and 3402 are unconstitutional, that income cannot be...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Snyder v. IRS
...courts have reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Granzow v. Commissioner, 739 F.2d 265, at 267 (7th Cir.1984); Lively v. Commissioner, 705 F.2d 1017 (8th Cir.1983); Knighten v. Commissioner, 702 F.2d 59, 60 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 249, 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983); Uni......
-
Cameron v. IRS
...other courts have reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Granzow v. Commissioner, 739 F.2d 265 at 267 (7th Cir.1984); Lively v. Commissioner, 705 F.2d 1017 (8th Cir.1983); Knighten v. Commissioner, 702 F.2d 59, 60 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 249, 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983)......
-
Young v. IRS
...courts have reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Granzow v. Commissioner, 739 F.2d 265 at 267 (7th Cir.1984); Lively v. Commissioner, 705 F.2d 1017 (8th Cir. 1983); Knighten v. Commissioner, 702 F.2d 59, 60 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 249, 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983); Uni......
-
United States v. Jones
...United States, 919 F.2d 830, 834 (2d Cir. 1990); Lonsdale v. United States, 919 F.2d 1440, 1448 (10th Cir. 1990); Lively v. Commissioner, 705 F.2d 1017, 1018 (8th Cir. 1983). Based on the foregoing, the Court finds Ms. Jones is fully aware that the theories upon which she prepared these tax......