Livermore v. Blood
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
| Writing for the Court | HOLMES |
| Citation | 40 Mo. 48 |
| Parties | ELIJAH LIVERMORE, Respondent, v. JAMES H. BLOOD AND GEORGE W. BLOOD, Appellants. |
| Decision Date | 31 March 1867 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 practice notes
-
Newco Land Co. v. Martin, 40289.
...of the illegality of the check, and it is this actual knowledge that is charged in law to the Committee. Consult Livermore v. Blood, 40 Mo. 48. Colby v. Riggs Nat'l Bk., 92 F. 2d 183, stressed by the Committee, is readily distinguished on the facts. No agent of said defendant had actual kno......
-
Hickman v. Green
...her. He admitted a small portion of the will was adduced before him at the time. Her agent, Mr. Nelson, also knew it. Linermore v. Blood, 40 Mo. 48; Bank v. Hoefer, 88 Mo. 37. (3) The court erred in giving the judgment to defendant, when it should have been for plaintiff. The burden of show......
-
Baade v. Cramer
...the parties; and the principal is charged with notice of all the facts made known to the agent in the transaction. Livermore v. Blood, 40 Mo. 48; Kellogg v. Schnaake, 56 Mo. 136; Sec. 10022, R. S. 1909; 4 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law (2 Ed.), p. 306. (6) A party acquiring a promissory note from his......
-
J. C. Wilhoit (Revived In The Name of Ethel Julia Wilhoit v. Henry, 26,652
...45 Me. 183; Cottrell v. Watkins, 89 Va. 801, 17 S.E. 328; Osborn v. McClelland, 43 Ohio St. 284, 1 N.E. 644; Livermore v. Blood et al., 40 Mo. 48; Battle v. Weems, 44 Ala. 105; Coghlin v. May, 17 Cal. 515; Simons v. Morris, 53 Mich. 155; Note, 46, 18 N.W. 625 L. R. A. 753, and cases cited 7......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Newco Land Co. v. Martin, No. 40289.
...of the illegality of the check, and it is this actual knowledge that is charged in law to the Committee. Consult Livermore v. Blood, 40 Mo. 48. Colby v. Riggs Nat'l Bk., 92 F. 2d 183, stressed by the Committee, is readily distinguished on the facts. No agent of said defendant had actual kno......
-
J. C. Wilhoit (Revived In The Name of Ethel Julia Wilhoit v. Henry, 26,652
...45 Me. 183; Cottrell v. Watkins, 89 Va. 801, 17 S.E. 328; Osborn v. McClelland, 43 Ohio St. 284, 1 N.E. 644; Livermore v. Blood et al., 40 Mo. 48; Battle v. Weems, 44 Ala. 105; Coghlin v. May, 17 Cal. 515; Simons v. Morris, 53 Mich. 155; Note, 46, 18 N.W. 625 L. R. A. 753, and cases cited 7......
-
Webb v. Rice, 23356
...& Co. v. Smith, 6 Wallace, 492, 18 L.Ed. 931; Ashurst v. Bank of Australia, 37 Eng. Law [132 Miss. 670] & Eq. 195; Livermore v. Blood, 40 Mo. 48; Texas v. White, 7 Wall. (U.S.) 68, (19 L.Ed. 227); Texas v. Hardenberg, 10 Wall. (U.S.), 19 L.Ed. 839; Ethridge v. Gallagher, 55 Miss. 458. 4. Do......
-
Franklin Bank v. St. Louis Car Co.
...the note, have maintained a suit upon it against the maker, if it had then been mature.' The same doctrine is held in Livermore v. Blood, 40 Mo. 48; Foley v. Smith, 6 Wall. 492; Vermilye v. Adams Ex. Co., 21 Wall. 138; McKim v. King, 58 Md. 502." [See also Julian v. Calkins, 85 Mo. 202.] IV......
Request a trial to view additional results