Llewellyn v. Llewellyn
Decision Date | 05 February 1907 |
Parties | LLEWELLYN, Appellant, v. LLEWELLYN, Respondent |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Clark Circuit Court.--Hon. E. R. McKee, Judge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED (with directions).
O. S. & G. M. Callihan for appellant.
The quitclaim deed is inoperative under a mere description of the land to transfer said fund or any part of same to defendant even if such had been the intention of grantors in executing it. It conveyed to him only the twenty-four fifty-sixths part of the land inherited by them from John W. Llewellyn and Josephine Waples, and their interest in a fund in the hands of E. P. Spangler as administrator of said John W. Llewellyn arising from a sale in probate of the other part of the John W. Llewellyn land; this latter interest being specifically mentioned and described in the deed. 7 Ency. of Law (2 Ed.) pp. 464, 465, 466, and cases cited; Bisphams Equity (2 Ed.), secs. 307, 308, 320, and cases cited; Compton v. McMahan, 19 Mo.App. 494; Francisco v. Winfield, 161 Mo. 560; Cottman v. Grace, 3 L. R. A. 146; Hope v. Brener, 18 L. R. A. 462; Harrington v. Pier, 50 L. R. A. 311; 3 Pomeroy's Eq. Jurisprudence (2 Ed.), secs. 1159, 1160-1162 and 1164, and cases cited.
Whiteside & Yant and T. L. & L. J. Montgomery for respondent.
The partition decree was rendered May 31, 1904. The youngest child became of age October 12, 1904. The sale to respondent took place October 15, 1904. The motion to rebate the interest of plaintiff, executor, in favor of respondent was filed October 21, 1904. The record, therefore, discloses adverse claims to the proceeds of sale awarded to the plaintiff, executor, appellant here, in the decree, and the statute expressly authorizes the court to hear and determine same in all partition proceedings, which was done in this case. R. S. 1899, sec. 4416; Barkhoefer v. Barkhoefer, 93 Mo.App. 379.
--This controversy is over a portion of the proceeds realized by the sale in partition of sixty-eight acres of land. John W. Llewellyn, who died intestate December 16, 1886, owned the land in fee and is the original source of title to which the claims of all the parties in interest can be traced. He left surviving him as heirs at law, his father, Jacob W. Llewellyn, his brothers and sisters of the whole blood, Charles T., George E. and Martha A. Llewellyn and Nancy J. Benning and Josephine Waples, and his sisters of the half blood, Mary S., Maud U., Jessie and Edith A. Llewellyn. It follows that the land was inherited in eight undivided interests, six of which went to heirs of the whole blood and two to heirs of the half blood. Josephine Waples bought the undivided interests of Charles T., George E. and Jacob Llewellyn and Nancy J. Benning, thus acquiring an undivided five-eighths interest, which she died owning, leaving surviving her her husband Eugene Waples. They had a child which died in infancy and her said husband was therefore entitled to a life estate by curtesy in her said five-eighths interest. The heirs left by said Josephine Waples were her father, Jacob W.; her brothers, Charles T. and George E. Llewellyn; her whole sisters, Martha A. Llewellyn and Nancy J. Benning; and her half-sisters, Maud, Mary, Jessie and Edith Llewellyn. After her death the interests stood thus: Martha A. was entitled to an undivided one-eighth interest in the land as heir of her brother, the original owner, John W. Llewellyn, and to an undivided five fifty-sixths interest as the heir of her sister, Josephine Waples; that is to say, Martha was entitled to an undivided twelve fifty-sixths part. The father, Jacob W., the brothers, Charles T. and George E., and whole sister, Nancy J. Benning, were each entitled to a five fifty-sixths part as the heirs of Josephine Waples, and her four half-sisters each to an undivided one-sixteenth interest as heirs of John W. Llewellyn and five one-hundred-and-twelfths interest as heirs of Josephine Waples; or, adding those interests to a six fifty-sixths part. All interests inherited from Josephine Waples were subject to the life estate of Eugene Waples; that is to say, his life estate in five-eighths of the land. This estate by the curtesy Eugene Waples conveyed to Jacob Llewellyn, who, therefore, at his death February 16, 1895, owned said curtesy for the life of Waples, besides the five fifty-sixths part he had inherited from Mrs. Waples subject to said curtesy. By his last will Jacob Llewellyn appointed his son Charles T. Llewellyn his executor and directed him to sell certain property, including the land in controversy. The clause of the will in which the direction was given is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial