Lobell v. Stock Oil Company

Decision Date24 May 1913
Docket Number729
PartiesLOBELL v. STOCK OIL COMPANY
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

ERROR to the District Court, Natrona County, HON. DAVID H. CRAIG, judge.

Motion to dismiss granted and cause dismissed.

William H. Martz, for plaintiff in error.

Norton & Hagens, for defendant in error.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The petition in error in this case was filed August 28, 1912. No brief on behalf of plaintiff in error was ever filed as required by Rule 15 of this court, nor was any extension of time therefor applied for or granted. March 7, 1913, defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the proceedings in error for the failure of plaintiff in error to file briefs as required by said rule. It is provided by Rule 21, (104 Pac. XIV.): "When the plaintiff in error or party holding the affirmative has failed to file and serve his brief as required by these rules, the defendant in error or party holding the negative may have the cause dismissed, or may submit it, with or without oral argument." No excuse has been presented in this case for the failure to file briefs as required by the rule. The motion to dismiss will have to be granted and the cause dismissed, (Small v. Savings Bank, 16 Wyo. 126, 92 P. 289) and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Bunce
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • August 13, 1935
    ... ... O. BROWN, Judge ... Proceeding ... between the Stanolind Oil & Gas Company and another and ... Robert Guy Bunce. To review an adverse judgment, the ... Stanolind Oil & Gas ... Wyo. 126; Krause v. Mathews, 16 Wyo. 140; ... Grippen v. State, 20 Wyo. 486; Lobell v ... Company, 21 Wyo. 342; Yeager v. State, 22 Wyo ... 194; Ford v. Townsend, 22 Wyo. 397; ... ...
  • Shaul v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Company
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • November 14, 1933
    ...22 Wyo. 397; Small v. Johnson County Savings Bank, 16 Wyo. 126; Cook v. Bank, 13 Wyo. 187; Brown v. Brown, 29 Wyo. 60; Lobell v. Oil Company 21 Wyo. 342; Board Commissioners, 23 Wyo. 207; Bank v. Stout, 24 Wyo. 106; Sheep Company v. Oil Company, 29 Wyo. 59; Atkins v. Hunsaker, 29 Wyo. 411; ......
  • Harvey v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1938
    ...22 Wyo. 397; Boner v. Fall River Co. Bank, 25 Wyo. 88; Sheehan v. Macy Ditch Co., 12 Wyo. 176; Grippen v. State, 20 Wyo. 486; Lobell v. Stock Oil Co., 21 Wyo. 342; Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners, 23 207; Bank of Cody v. Stout, 24 Wyo. 106; Budd v. Roy, 26 Wyo. 210; Nelson v. Sunset......
  • Pearce v. Holm, Co. Treas
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1915
    ... ... (Grippen v ... State, 20 Wyo. 486, 124 P. 764, 128 P. 622; Lobell ... v. Stock Oil Co., 21 Wyo. 342, 132 P. 433; Small v ... Savings Bank, 16 Wyo. 126, 92 P ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT