Lockard v. Lockard
| Decision Date | 03 April 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 39577,39577 |
| Citation | 227 N.W.2d 581,193 Neb. 400 |
| Parties | Linda Karlene LOCKARD, Appellee, v. Lysle Leland LOCKARD, Appellant. |
| Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. In determining who shall receive custody of the minor children of the parties to an action for the dissolution of marriage the controlling consideration is the best interests and welfare of the children.
2. The fact that one of the parties to an action for the dissolution of marriage has committed adultery, although a relevant consideration, will not necessarily be determinative of who shall be awarded dustody of the minor children of those parties.
3. The fact that one of the parties to an action for the dissolution of marriage has committed adultery will not as a matter of law prevent an award of attorney's fees or affect the payment of costs under sections 42--351 and 42--367, R.R.S.1943.
Thomas A. Wagoner, Wagoner & Wagoner, Grand Island, for appellant.
Higgins, Higgins & Huber, Richard L. Huber, Grand Island, for appellee.
Heard before WHITE, C.J., and SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, NEWTON, CLINTON and BRODKEY, JJ.
This is an appeal from a decree in an action for the dissolution of marriage. The District Court ordered the dissolution of the marriage in question and awarded custody of the two minor children adopted by the parties, to the wife. The District Court further ordered the husband to pay all costs of the action, together with attorney's fees for the wife in the amount of $250. In this appeal the husband argues that the adultery of the wife was conclusively established by the evidence; and therefore as a matter of law, she would not be entitled to an award of custody or of attorney's fees, and should be required to pay the costs of the action. We affirm.
The appellant in this case relies almost exclusively upon the case of Wolpa v. Wolpa, 182 Neb. 178, 153 N.W.2d 746 (1967), wherein this court held that where a wife is conclusively found to be guilty of adultery, she is an unfit person as a matter of law to have the care and custody of her minor children as against the husband she has wronged. The court also held in that case that where adultery of a wife is established, she is not entitled to an award of alimony or attorney's fees, and the costs of the action in such case are ordinarily taxable to the wife. The same rules have also been expressed, in slightly varied forms, in other cases decided by this court. See, Yost v. Yost, 161 Neb. 164, 72 N.W.2d 689 (1955); Baker v. Baker, 166 Neb. 306, 89 N.W.2d 35 (1958); Beck v. Beck, 175 Neb. 108, 120 N.W.2d 585 (1963); Houghton v. Houghton, 179 Neb. 275, 137 N.W.2d 861 (1965); Covalut v. Covalut, 182 Neb. 119, 153 N.W.2d 292 (1967); and Morrissey v. Morrissey, 182 Neb. 268, 154 N.W.2d 66 (1967). However, in Fisher v. Fisher, 185 Neb. 469, 176 N.W.2d 667 (1970), this court expressly modified the rule in the earlier cases relating to the effect of the wife's adultery upon the matter of child custody, although the effect of such conduct upon the issues of costs and attorney's fees was not discussed. The appellant now asserts that under our prior decisions we are compelled to hold in the case now before us that the District Court erred in its disposition relating to child custody, attorney's fees, and costs. We do not agree.
We believe that whatever the former rules regarding the effect of a wife's adultery upon such matters may have been, those rules can no longer be regarded as controlling under Nebraska's current nofault divorce law. Barnes v. Barnes, 192 Neb. 295, 220 N.W.2d 22 (1974). See Henderson, Practice and Problems Under Nebraska's New Divorce Laws, 52 Neb.L.Rev. 1, 16 (1972). The matters now before us must necessarily be resolved upon the basis of the language and legislative policy of the statutes presently applicable.
Child custody is now controlled by section 42--364, R.R.S.1943, which provides, among other things: 'Custody and visitation of minor children shall be determined on the basis of their best interests.' The statute has been expanded since its original enactment, although the 'best interests' requirement has not been changed. It is now clear that in determining who shall receive custody of the minor children of the parties to an action for the dissolution of marriage the controlling consideration is the best interests and welfare of the children. Schott v. Schott, 190 Neb. 84, 206 N.W.2d 39 (1973). It would be contrary to the plain meaning of section 42--364, R.R.S.1943, for us to hold, assuming equal fitness of the parents, that custody should be denied to a parent guilty of adultery, and to disregard the issue of where the best interest of the children lie. Since we cannot say as a matter of fact that it would always be in the best interests of the children for custody to be denied to an adulterous...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Davis v. Davis
...of the majority of other courts around the country. See, e. g., Dinkel v. Dinkel, supra, 322 So.2d at 24; Lockard v. Lockard, 193 Neb. 400, 227 N.W.2d 581, 583 (1975); Commonwealth of Pa. ex rel. Myers v. Myers, Pa., 360 A.2d 587, 590 (1976). See generally Annot., 23 A.L.R.3d 6, 38-42 (1969......
-
Koch v. Koch, 44056
...considered in determining the best interests of the child. Ahlman v. Ahlman, 201 Neb. 273, 267 N.W.2d 521 (1978); Lockard v. Lockard, 193 Neb. 400, 227 N.W.2d 581 (1975). We have also stated the general rule to be that when a controversy arises between the natural parents as to the custody ......
-
Kringel v. Kringel, 42971
...considered in determining the best interests of the children. Ahlman v. Ahlman, 201 Neb. 273, 267 N.W.2d 521 (1978); Lockard v. Lockard, 193 Neb. 400, 227 N.W.2d 581 (1975). We have also stated the general rule to be that, when a controversy arises between the natural parents as to the cust......
-
Ahlman v. Ahlman
...may properly be considered in determining what is in the best interests of a child. See, Bartley v. Bartley, supra; Lockard v. Lockard, 193 Neb. 400, 227 N.W.2d 581 (1975). Exposure to children of the illegal use of a controlled substance is obviously not in their best interests, and the tr......
-
Influence on Nebraska Supreme Court
...0 1975 - 3 State v. Wilmore, 192 Neb. 807, 815, 224 N.W.2d 756, 760 (1975)(citing 53 NEB. L. REV. 331, 414 (1974)). Lockhard v. Lockhard, 193 Neb. 400, 402, 227 N.W.2d 581, 582 (1975)(citing 52 NEB. L. REV. 1, 16 Royal Indem. Co. v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co., 193 Neb. 752, 757, 229 N.W.2d 183......