Lockett v. Wood, 10101.
Decision Date | 13 June 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 10101.,10101. |
Parties | LOCKETT et al. v. WOOD et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Washington County; John H. Tate, Judge.
Action for construction of the will of Frank W. Wood, deceased, by R. B. Lockett, administrator of the estate of Howard B. Wood, deceased, and others against Alma Hosea Wood and others, in which Henry A. Wood, Jr., and another, minors, through their mother and next friend, Zelia Wood, and others intervened. From the judgment, R. B. Lockett, administrator of the estate of Howard B. Wood, deceased, the defendants, and the minor interveners appeal.
Reversed and rendered.
Ocie Speer, of Austin, for appellant R. B. Lockett.
Wright Stubbs, of Austin, for appellants Alma Hosea Wood and others.
Searcy & Hodde, of Brenham, for appellees First Nat. Bank of Brenham and others.
Baker, Botts, Andrews & Wharton, of Houston, for appellee Peden Iron & Steel Co. LANE, Justice.
On the 22d day of April, 1911, Frank W. Wood and his wife, Alma Hosea Wood, were the owners of certain property and effects, all of which was the community property of the husband and wife. On the date above stated, Frank W. Wood made and executed his last will and testament, which, omitting formal parts, reads as follows:
After the execution of the will Frank W. Wood executed a codicil to his will, which was attached thereto as a part thereof, wherein and whereby his wife, Alma Hosea Wood, and his sons, Howard B. Wood and Henry A. Wood, and his daughter, Mattie Reeves Wood, are appointed executrix and executors of his will, without bond or security. It is recited in said codicil as follows:
Frank W. Wood, the testator, died, and his will and codicil attached thereto were duly probated, and Alma Hosea Wood, the surviving wife of the testator, duly qualified as executrix of said will and codicil and has at all times since said qualification acted as independent executrix of said will and testament.
After the death of Frank W. Wood, testator, Howard B. Wood, one of the devisees and legatees named in the will, died without issue, and after his death R. B. Lockett was the duly appointed and qualified administrator of his estate. Howard B. Wood left surviving him his wife, Agnes Burt Wood.
Henry A. Wood died after the death of his father, Frank W. Wood, and left surviving him his widow, Zelia Wood, and his two children, Henry Wood, Jr., and Frank W. Wood, III, both being minors at the time of the hearing of this case.
This action was brought by R. B. Lockett, administrator of the estate of Howard B. Wood, deceased, seeking a court construction of the will and testament of Frank W. Wood, deceased.
All of the beneficiaries under the will were made parties defendant, but service was not complete upon the minor defendants, Henry A. Wood, Jr., and Frank W. Wood, III, but with leave of the court, through their mother and next friend, Zelia Wood, intervened in the cause.
The First National Bank, Washington County State Bank, Fred Heineke, and Peden Iron & Steel Company, creditors of Howard B. Wood, deceased, intervened in the cause by leave of the court.
The defendants and the minor interveners answered, admitting all the facts alleged in plaintiff's petition, joined in the plaintiff's prayer for a construction of the will, and did plead their interpretation of the will, to wit, that the estate of Howard B. Wood, deceased, was a defeasible one and terminated upon his death without issue, and that his present estate (succession) owns no right, title, or interest in the estate of Frank W. Wood, deceased.
The intervening creditors likewise joined in the prayer for a construction, pointing out the particulars in which the construction was sought, and pleaded their interpretation, which was that under the undisputed facts the devise to Howard B. Wood became absolute upon his father's, Frank W. Wood's, death, and that the estate of Howard B. Wood is now vested with title in fee simple, to an undivided one-fourth interest, in the estate of Frank W. Wood, deceased.
There is no issue of fact raised by the pleadings, since the answer of the defendants proper, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Graser v. Graser
...709; Arrington v. McDaniel, Tex.Com.App., 14 S.W.2d 1009; Jackson v. Templin, Tex.Com.App., 66 S.W.2d 666, 92 A.L.R. 873; Lockett v. Wood, Tex.Civ. App., 84 S.W.2d 798; First Me. Church South v. Anderson, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W. 2d 1177. While such intention must be ascertained from the word......
-
Cragin v. Frost Nat. Bank
...and discussing a conditional fee are numerous. They include West v. Glisson, Tex.Civ.App., 184 S.W. 1042, error refused; Lockett v. Wood, Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 798, affirmed Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. Lockett, 131 Tex. 287, 115 S.W.2d 405; Federal Land Bank v. Little, Tex. Civ.App., 79 S.W......
-
First Nat. Bank v. Trinity Protestant Episcopal Church
...therewith, as to its major claim for its construction, recites this: "No case directly in point has been found." Lockett v. Wood, Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 798; Odom v. Langston, 355 Mo. 115, 195 S.W. 2d 466; Hunt v. White, 24 Tex. 643; Darragh v. Barmore, Tex.Com.App., 242 S.W. 714; Packard ......
-
Morriss v. Pickett
...he intended every part, sentence, clause, and word to have a meaning and to play a part in the disposition of his property. Lockett v. Wood, 84 S.W.2d 798, 801 (Tex.Civ.App.--Galveston 1935, affirmed 131 Tex. 287, 115 S.W.2d 405 (1938)).2 In Heinneman v. Colorado College, 150 Colo. 515, 374......