Lockner v. Pierce Cnty., 94643-4

Decision Date04 October 2017
Docket NumberNo. 94643-4,94643-4
Citation403 P.3d 45 (Table),189 Wash.2d 1009
Parties Margie LOCKNER, Respondent, v. PIERCE COUNTY, et al., Petitioners.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon-McCloud, considered at its October 3, 2017, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.


¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted and review of the issues raised in the Respondent's answer to the petition is also granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. Salgado-Mendoza
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • October 12, 2017
  • Lockner v. Pierce Cnty.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • April 19, 2018
    ...court to examine whether RCW 4.24.210 extends immunity to negligence actions. We granted review of both issues. Lockner v. Pierce County , 189 Wash.2d 1009, 403 P.3d 45 (2017). ANALYSIS ¶ 9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Campbell v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. , 166 Wash.2d 466, 47......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT