Lockwood v. Ho'lliday
Decision Date | 01 May 1880 |
Parties | Lockwood v. Ho'lliday, trustee, et al. |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
1. A consent decree dismissing a bill with costs, with no saving therein of the right to bring another suit, is an adjudication of the merits of the cause.
2. Parol evidence, in the absence of fraud or mistake, will not be received to engraft upon or incorporate with a valid written contract an incident occurring contemporaneously therewith and inconsistent with its terms.
Appeal from and supersedeas to two decrees of the circuit court of the county of Marshall, rendered, one on the 12th day of December, 1876, and the other on the 8th day of August, 1877, in a cause in chancery in said court then pending, wherein J. H. Lockwood was plaintiff and R. C. Holliday, trustee, and others were defendants, allowed upon the petition of said Lockwood.
Hon. T. Melvin, judge of the first judicial circuit, rendered the decrees appealed from.
Johnson, Judge, furnishes the following statement of the case:
The plaintiff, Lockwood, and James Burley in his lifetime had large dealings with each other, and on the 16th day of December, 1869, a short time before the said James Burley died, and while he was quite sick, they made a settlement, in which it was ascertained that the said Lockwood was indebted to said Burley in the sum of $1,000.00, for which the said Lockwood and wife on 8. the 25th day of December, 1869, executed a deed of trust to R. C. Holliday, trustee, to secure the said debt. After said Burley's death, to wit, in July, 1873, said Lockwood obtained an injunction to restrain the sale under said deed of trust, among others upon the ground that mistakes to a large amount were made against him in said settlement, and that said settlement was made under unfavorable circumstances, said Burloy being, as he alleged, in a dying condition, and that he was denied access to papers that were necessary to a correct settlement, &c, and among other things prayed for an account between himself and the estate of said Burley. Said Lockwood took a number of depositions in the cause, to support his bill, and on the 6th day of April, 1874, a consent decree was entered in the cause, dissolving the injunction and dismissing the bill, with costs.
On the 27th day of January, 1874, Lockwood entered into the following agreement:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kanawha Banking & Trust Co v. Gilbert
...its terms, in the absence of fraud, accident or mistake in its procurement. Hurst v. Hurst, 7 W.Va. 289; Lockwood v. Holliday, Trustee, 16 W.Va. 651; Paxton v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co., 80 W.Va. 187, 94 S.E. 472; Jones v. Kessler, 98 W.Va. 1, 126 S.E. 344; Collins v. Treat, 108 W.Va. 443, 152 ......
-
Banking v. Gilbert, (No. 9873)
...its terms, in the absence of fraud, accident or mistake in its procurement. Hurst v. Hurst, 7 W. Va. 289; Lockwood v. Holliday, Trustee, 16 W. Va. 651; Paxton v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co., 80 W. Va. 187, 94 S. E. 472; Jones v. Kessler, 98 W. Va. 1, 126 S. E. 344; Collins v. Treat, 108 W. Va. 44......
-
Kanawha Banking & Trust Co. v. Gilbert
...vary or explain its terms, in the absence of fraud, accident or mistake in its procurement. Hurst v. Hurst, 7 W.Va. 289; Lockwood v. Holliday, Trustee, 16 W.Va. 651; Paxton v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co., 80 W.Va. 187, S.E. 472; Jones v. Kessler, 98 W.Va. 1, 126 S.E. 344; Collins v. Treat, 108 W.......
-
Cent. Trust Co. v. Va. Trust Co..
...will not be admitted, to incorporate them in it, so as to add to, alter, or contradict the agreement spoken by the writing.' Lockwood v. Holliday, 16 W. Va. 651; Howell v. Behler, 41 W. Va. 610, 24 S. E. 646; Ins. Co. v. Board of Education, 49 W. Va. 360, 38 S. E. 679; Ryan v. Nuce, 67 W. V......