Logan-Baldwin v. Morningstar, LOGAN-BALDWIN and L

Decision Date18 November 1992
Docket NumberLOGAN-BALDWIN and L,No. 1,1
Citation592 N.Y.S.2d 291,187 A.D.2d 1023
PartiesEmmelyneroy Baldwin, Individually and as Husband and Wife, Respondents, v. Elizabeth MORNINGSTAR, M.D., and Ruth Schwartz, M.D., Appellants. Appeal
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Robert J. Hirsch, P.C. by Christopher Noone, Rochester, for appellants. Birnbaum, McDermott & Friedman, P.C. (Irwin Birnbaum, of counsel), Syracuse, for respondents.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The latest date upon which defendants treated plaintiff Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin was October 19, 1984, when defendant Dr. Morningstar examined plaintiff for the last time without scheduling a future appointment (see, Massie v. Crawford, 78 N.Y.2d 516, 577 N.Y.S.2d 223, 583 N.E.2d 935; Rizk v. Cohen, 73 N.Y.2d 98, 103, 538 N.Y.S.2d 229, 535 N.E.2d 282; Richardson v. Orentreich, 64 N.Y.2d 896, 898, 487 N.Y.S.2d 731, 477 N.E.2d 210; McDermott v. Torre, 56 N.Y.2d 399, 405, 452 N.Y.S.2d 351, 437 N.E.2d 1108). The evidence upon which plaintiffs rely to establish continuing treatment after that date is insufficient as a matter of law (see, Cooper v. Kaplan, 163 A.D.2d 215, 558 N.Y.S.2d 939, affd. 78 N.Y.2d 1103, 578 N.Y.S.2d 124, 585 N.E.2d 373; Parrott v. Rand, 126 A.D.2d 621, 511 N.Y.S.2d 57, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 611, 517 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 511 N.E.2d 85). Consequently, Supreme Court erred by denying defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint as time-barred. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Affronti, J.-- Summary Judgment.)

CALLAHAN, J.P., and BOOMER, BALIO, FALLON and DOERR, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Pinzotti v. New York State Thruway Authority, 77797
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 18, 1992
  • Logan-Baldwin v. Morningstar
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 25, 1993
    ...N.Y.2d 705, 611 N.E.2d 301 Logan-Baldwin (Emmelyn) v. Morningstar (Elizabeth) NO. 55 Court of Appeals of New York Feb 25, 1993 187 A.D.2d 1023, 592 N.Y.S.2d 291 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO GRANTED OR DENIED. Denied. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT