Loggins v. State
| Decision Date | 24 October 2017 |
| Docket Number | No. ED 104516,ED 104516 |
| Parties | Vernell J. LOGGINS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
FOR APPELLANT: Rosemary E. Percival, Office of the State Public Defender, 920 Main Street, Ste. 500, Kansas City, MO 64105-2017.
FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
Vernell J. Loggins, Jr. appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ristesund v. Johnson & Johnson
...characterized BMS as a "straightforward application ... of settled principles of personal jurisdiction[.]" Id. at 1783 ; accord Fox, 539 S.W.3d at 53 (Odenwald, J., concurring) ( BMS reaffirmed traditional principles of personal jurisdiction). Ristesund is charged with knowing the requireme......