Lokey v. Richardson
| Decision Date | 09 September 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 74-1256,74-1256 |
| Citation | 540 F.2d 1022 |
| Parties | Bob LOKEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. H. L. RICHARDSON, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen. of Cal., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before BROWNING, ELY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Because the legal and factual considerations relevant to the decision of this case in light of Montanye v. Haymes, --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d --- (1976), and Meachum v. Fano, --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d --- (1976), were not addressed by the parties or the district court, the summary judgment, reversed by the Court of Appeals, 9 Cir., 527 F.2d 949, with certiorari granted by the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 3186, 49 L.Ed.2d ---, is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with those decisions.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lokey v. Richardson
...427 U.S. 236, 96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d 466 (1976).1 The Ninth Circuit, in turn, remanded the case to this court in Lokey v. Richardson, 540 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1976). After we dismissed the case, in part in reliance on Meachum v. Fano, supra, and Montanye v. Haymes, supra, the action came ......
-
Clark v. Tarrant County, Tex., Civ. A. No. 4-82-260 K.
... ... State of California, 511 F.Supp. 1244, 1257-58 (E.D.Cal.1981); Louis v. Supreme Court of Nevada, 490 F.Supp. 1174, 1180 (D.Nev.1980); see also Lokey v. Richardson, 534 F.Supp. 1015, 1019 (N.D.Cal.1982) ("the California Adult Authority is ... absolutely immune from liability") rev'd on other ... ...
-
Lokey v. Richardson
...not addressed the legal and factual issues made relevant by Meachum and Montanye, we remanded to the district court. Lokey v. Richardson, 540 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1976). The district court dismissed the complaint with the following This matter having been submitted to the Court for considera......