London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. Smith
Citation | 290 S.W. 774 |
Decision Date | 09 December 1926 |
Docket Number | (No. 428.)<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Parties | LONDON GUARANTY & ACCIDENT CO., Limited, v. SMITH. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Hill County; Horton B. Porter, Judge.
Suit by Miss Eura Smith against the London Guarantee & Accident Company, Limited, to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and judgment rendered for defendant.
Thomas, Frank, Milam & Touchstone, of Dallas, for appellant.
R. H. Vogel, of Dallas, and J. D. Stephenson, of Hillsboro, for appellee.
Appellee filed this suit to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board, and to recover of appellant, under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act ( ), compensation for certain injuries sustained by her on October 25, 1925, while in the employ of Martin-Dandridge Company, a subscriber to the Employers' Liability Act of the state of Texas. The only issue involved in the case was and is whether or not the injuries which were received by appellee were received while she was in the course of her employment with the Martin-Dandridge Company, within the meaning and intention of said Workmen's Compensation Act. The trial court instructed a verdict for appellee for $681.96, and entered judgment accordingly.
Under appellant's assignments of error it claims the court erred in refusing to instruct a verdict for defendant, and in rendering judgment for the plaintiff, because, as it contends, the undisputed evidence shows that at the time the plaintiff received her injuries she was not in the course of her employment within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act, with the Martin-Dandridge Company. There is no conflict in the evidence. The record discloses the following state of facts bearing upon the only question involved:
Appellee was employed by Martin-Dandridge Company in Hillsboro in the capacity of saleslady and buyer, and was so employed on Saturday, October 25, 1925. The store closed at 9 o'clock on Saturday nights. Mr. Martin, the manager of Martin-Dandridge Company, about 6 p. m. on said date told appellee, as soon as she could get off, to go and get her supper and hurry back, and as soon as she got back they would go to the Wear Hotel to see a line of merchandise; that the lady who had the line of merchandise had been waiting all day to show them. So about 6:45 p. m. appellee, in response to said instructions, left the store to go and get her evening meal, and was to return in about 30 minutes to go and see said samples. Appellee rode a part of the way with a friend in going to her boarding house, and then got out of her friend's car, and started to cross the street to reach her boarding place, and was struck while in the street by a passing automobile, and injured. The place where appellee was injured in a public street was several blocks away from the premises of her employer. J. W. Martin testified as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Surety Corporation v. Bellah
...McKim v. Commercial Standard Insurance Company, Tex. Civ.App., 179 S.W.2d 357, writ of error refused; London Guaranty and Accident Company v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 290 S. W. 774, writ of error refused; Jasper v. Texas Employers' Insurance Association, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 646; Smith v. T......
-
New York Casualty Co. v. Wetherell
...out of work hours in going to and from work. American Indemnity Co. v. Dinkins, Tex. Civ.App., 211 S.W. 949; London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 290 S.W. 774; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Palmer, Tex.Civ.App., 286 S.W. 283; Central Surety & Ins. Co. v. Howard, 5 Cir., 47 F.2d 1......
-
Reeves v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
...by reason of instructions of his employer, such as, Etna Life Ins. Co. v. Palmer, Tex.Civ.App., 286 S.W. 283; London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 290 S.W. 774; Gombert v. London Guarantee & Accident Co., 5 Cir., 100 F.2d 352; Royalty Indemnity Co. v. Madrigal, Tex.Civ.App......
-
Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Matthews
...Ragle (Tex. Com. App.) 40 S.W.(2d) 63; Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Bailey (Tex. Civ. App.) 266 S. W. 192; London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 290 S. W. 774; Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Riggins (Tex. Civ. App.) 291 S. W. 276; Associated Employers' Rec. v. Simm......