Long v. Davis, 12024.
Decision Date | 21 September 1948 |
Docket Number | No. 12024.,12024. |
Parties | LONG v. DAVIS et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Hunter & Liljestrom, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Milton V. Backman, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellees.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges.
This appeal is from a motion granting a new trial. The appeal was taken on July 9, 1948. Appellees moved to dismiss it on the ground that the order was not a final decision, within the meaning of § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225(a),1 1946 Edition, then in effect, and hence was not appealable. The motion is well founded. Sentinel v. Dinwiddie, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 57; Hunt v. United States, 10 Cir., 53 F. 2d 333; East Erie Commercial Co. v. Denial, 3 Cir., 66 F.2d 555; Frank Mercantile Corp. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 3 Cir., 115 F. 2d 496. Accordingly, it is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
1 Now 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Dior
...(9th Cir. 1963); Gilliland v. Lyons, 278 F.2d 56 (9th Cir. 1960); United States v. Hayes, 172 F.2d 677 (9th Cir. 1949); Long v. Davis, 169 F.2d 982 (9th Cir. 1948). We have yet to decide whether new trial orders in criminal cases are appealable before retrial. 5 We conclude that they are Th......
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, 11100.
...S. Co., 2 Cir., 150 F.2d 54; Howell v. Terminal R. Association, 8 Cir., 155 F.2d 807; Florini v. Stegner, 3 Cir., 82 F.2d 708; Long v. Davis, 9 Cir., 169 F.2d 982; Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 57. Under such circumstances, the final judgment has been set aside and there is no ......
-
Gilliland v. Lyons
...it is not a "final" order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Phillips v. Negley, 1886, 117 U.S. 665, 6 S.Ct. 901, 29 L.Ed. 1013; Long v. Davis, 9 Cir., 1948, 169 F.2d 982. The order is interlocutory since it destroys the finality of the judgment and there is no "final decision" from which an appeal wi......
-
Tsoleas v. Hege, 7520.
...Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Sonenshine, 4 Cir., 226 F.2d 220; Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, 6 Cir., 185 F.2d 531; Long v. Davis, 9 Cir., 169 F.2d 982; Barbarino v. Stanhope S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 150 F.2d 54; Balicki v. Central Greyhound Lines, 3 Cir., 150 F.2d 402; Youdan v. Majestic ......