Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie
Decision Date | 28 May 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 4347.,4347. |
Citation | 41 F.2d 57 |
Parties | SENTINEL CO. v. DINWIDDIE. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Charles B. Quarles, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant.
Aaron B. Rosenthal, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellee.
Before EVANS, PAGE, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant's publication of an alleged libel. The verdict of the jury in appellee's favor was, on his motion, set aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.
Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must be granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, 11100.
...R. Association, 8 Cir., 155 F.2d 807; Florini v. Stegner, 3 Cir., 82 F.2d 708; Long v. Davis, 9 Cir., 169 F.2d 982; Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 57. Under such circumstances, the final judgment has been set aside and there is no existing judgment from which an appeal can be ta......
-
Grazia v. Anderson., 587.
...37 L.Ed. 438; Tracy v. Holcombe, 24 How. 426, 16 L.Ed. 742; East Erie Commercial R. Co. v. Denial, 3 Cir., 66 F.2d 555; Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 57; Wright v. Taft-Pierce Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 287 Fed. 131; Farrell v. First Nat. Bank, 3 Cir., 254 F.2d 801; Cloquet Lumber Co. v......
-
Long v. Davis, 12024.
...Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225(a),1 1946 Edition, then in effect, and hence was not appealable. The motion is well founded. Sentinel v. Dinwiddie, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 57; Hunt v. United States, 10 Cir., 53 F. 2d 333; East Erie Commercial Co. v. Denial, 3 Cir., 66 F.2d 555; Frank Mercantile Corp. v. Pr......
- Levi Strauss Realty Co. v. United States, 6016.