Long v. Mount Carmel Health Sys.
Decision Date | 27 June 2017 |
Docket Number | No. 16AP–511,16AP–511 |
Citation | 2017 Ohio 5522,93 N.E.3d 436 |
Parties | Joseph LONG, M.D., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant–Appellee. |
Court | Ohio Court of Appeals |
On brief: Hammond Law Office, Gary W. Hammond ; Butler Cincione & DiCuccio, and N. Gerald DiCuccio, Columbus, for appellant. Argued: Gary W. Hammond.
On brief: Ice Miller LLP, Kris M. Dawley, and Robert J. Cochran, Columbus, for appellee. Argued: Kris M. Dawley.
DECISION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Joseph Long, M.D., appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Mount Carmel Health System ("Mount Carmel"). For the following reasons, we affirm.
{¶ 2} Mount Carmel owns and operates multiple hospitals in the Columbus area, including Mount Carmel West. On February 1, 2012, Mount Carmel contracted with Consultant Anesthesiologists, Inc. ("CAI"), a medical practice group, to provide professional anesthesiology services at Mount Carmel West (hereinafter the "Services Agreement"). The Services Agreement stated that all the anesthesiologists CAI selected to practice at Mount Carmel West would be subject to Mount Carmel's approval, and that Mount Carmel approved all of the CAI anesthesiologists currently practicing at Mount Carmel West. Among those approved physicians was Long, an anesthesiologist who CAI employed under a contract. Long was a member of the Mount Carmel West medical staff and had privileges at Mount Carmel West. After Mount Carmel and CAI executed the Services Agreement, Long practiced anesthesiology at Mount Carmel West pursuant to that contract.
{¶ 3} In early April 2012, Mount Carmel removed Long from the Mount Carmel West campus. Melissa W. Fleming, assistant general counsel at Mount Carmel, explained Mount Carmel's reasons for removing Long in an April 5, 2012 letter to Brandi Kondracke, CAI's chief executive officer. Fleming stated:
(Apr. 5, 2012 letter from Fleming to Kondracke, attached to Compl.)
{¶ 4} Fleming also informed Kondracke that Mount Carmel had not yet completed its investigation into Long's actions. Fleming requested a meeting with Kondracke to discuss the situation, and she promised to provide Kondracke with the results of Mount Carmel's investigation prior to the meeting.
{¶ 5} Melissa Stacy–Cull, the director of surgical services at Mount Carmel West, investigated Long's conduct. Stacy–Cull interviewed A.M., as well as other members of the nursing staff. Stacy–Cull neither viewed the photographs at issue nor spoke with Long or the physician who received the photographs from Long. At the conclusion of her investigation, Stacy–Cull drafted a report, dated April 11, 2012, that generally confirmed the conduct described in the April 5, 2012 letter. Mount Carmel sent a copy of the report to Kondracke.
{¶ 6} Mount Carmel representatives met with CAI representatives on April 13, 2012 to discuss Long. Prior to the meeting, Sean McKibben, president and chief operating officer of Mount Carmel West, and Larry Swanner, vice president of medical affairs at Mount Carmel West, had decided to permanently bar Long from practicing at Mount Carmel West. McKibben announced Mount Carmel's decision at the meeting. Thomas Englehart, CAI's then president, asked the Mount Carmel representatives to consider giving Long a second chance given the long length and high quality of Long's service at Mount Carmel West. Mount Carmel declined.
{¶ 7} Pursuant to Long's employment contract with CAI, Long was required to "devote his * * * full time and attention to the performance of professional services for" CAI and "be responsible for providing on call coverage." (July 21, 2009 Employment Agreement at Section 3, attached to the Compl.) Once Mount Carmel removed Long from Mount Carmel West, he could no longer perform those contractual duties. Consequently, CAI terminated Long's employment agreement.
{¶ 8} On October 24, 2013, Long filed suit against Mount Carmel, alleging claims for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract, and seeking a declaratory judgment. In his complaint and amended complaint, Long asserted that Mount Carmel failed to follow the process set forth in the Services Agreement regarding CAI physicians with alleged performance or behavior issues. Section 4.2 of the Services Contract provided:
(Feb. 1, 2012 Agreement for Anesthesia Services, attached to Mount Carmel's Mot. for Summ. Jgmt.) Long alleged that Mount Carmel breached Section 4.2 when it failed to: (1) provide him with any notice, (2) include him in the April 13 meeting, and (3) work with him to mutually resolve the issues caused by his alleged misconduct.
{¶ 9} Long also asserted in his complaint that Mount Carmel's actions breached the Medical Staff Bylaws, which are the rules, policies, and procedures governing the medical staff of Mount Carmel West. Long alleged that the Medical Staff Bylaws entitled him to certain protections, including notice and a hearing, which Mount Carmel denied him. Finally, with regard to his claim for tortious interference with contract, Long claimed that Mount Carmel's refusal to allow him to practice at Mount Carmel West improperly interfered with his employment contract with CAI. Long contended that, due to Mount Carmel's decision to bar him from Mount Carmel West, he could not perform his duties under the employment contract and CAI terminated the contract.
{¶ 10} After conducting discovery, both parties moved for summary judgment. In a judgment dated June 17, 2016, the trial court granted Mount Carmel's motion and denied Long's motion. Long timely appeals.
{¶ 11} Long assigns the following errors for our review:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kent State Univ. v. Bradley Univ.
...to prove that the defendant lacked a proper justification in securing the breach of the agreement. Long v. Mt. Carmel Health Sys., 10th Dist. Franklin, 2017-Ohio-5522, 93 N.E.3d 436, ¶27.{¶30} The Ford-KSU employment agreement states in pertinent part:{¶31} "2. a. The term of this contract ......
-
Edelstein v. Stephens
...intentional procurement of the contract's breach, (4) lack of justification, and (5) resulting damages. Long v. Mt. Carmel Health System, 93 N.E.3d 436, 445 (Oh. Ct. App. 2017) (citing Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & Hadden, 707 N.E.2d 853, 855, syll. ¶ 1 (Ohio 1999)). To prove lack of j......
-
Revere Plastic Sys., LLC v. Plastic Plate, LLC
...intentional procurement of the contract's breach, (4) lack of justification, and (5) resulting damages." Long v. Mount Carmel Health Sys. , 93 N.E.3d 436, 445 (Ohio 2017). Proof of damages is a necessary element. See Koury v. City of Canton , 221 F. App'x 379, 387 (6th Cir. 2007) (affirming......
- Am. Hotel Grp., LLC v. Wyandotte Plaza, LLC