Longworth v. Aslin
Decision Date | 12 October 1891 |
Citation | 106 Mo. 155,17 S.W. 294 |
Parties | LONGWORTH v. ASLIN. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Stoddard county; JOHN G. WEAR, Judge.
Ejectment by Temperance E. Longworth against John F. Aslin. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.
Sol. G. Kitchen, for appellant. Houck & Keaton, for respondent.
This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of 80 acres of land lying in Stoddard county. The petition is in the usual form. The answer contains a general denial, and sets up an equitable estoppel. The facts alleged by way of estoppel are that the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company owned the land, and that plaintiff told defendant her title to it was bad, and agreed that if defendant would obtain the title of said company, and pay plaintiff for improvements made by her, she would not have any further claim to the land; and that defendant, relying on these representations, purchased the title of said company, and paid plaintiff for her improvements. To this answer plaintiff replied by way of general denial. Plaintiff's title arises in this manner. The Cairo & Fulton Railroad Company is the common source of title. The land in controversy, with other lands, in pursuance of authority given by the statutes of Missouri, were conveyed by said Cairo & Fulton Railroad Company to trustees, to be sold to raise money for the construction of its road. This conveyance was of date May 23, 1857. On July 23, 1859, the trustees sold the land in controversy to H. H. Bedford, and by intermediate conveyances plaintiff acquired the title of Bedford. The defendant claims title also through the Cairo & Fulton Railroad Company by virtue of the foreclosure of the state's lien thereon and a sale thereunder. The record shows that from 1869 plaintiff, and those under whom she claims, had possession of this land till 1881. In 1880 plaintiff's husband leased the land to defendant. In October or November, 1881, plaintiff's husband died. Defendant testified as follows: He thereupon bought the land from the railroad company, agreeing to pay $350 for it, and the railroad company executed to him a deed for it dated November 26, 1881. Defendant says Mrs. Longworth told him he could buy the land for $300, and, if he could, he was to pay her $300 for her interest, and she would be satisfied. After defendant purchased the land from the railroad company, plaintiff moved to Tennessee, and left C. H. Barham as her agent. Defendant and C. H. Barham tried to agree upon the amount defendant should pay plaintiff, but in this they failed. They finally left it to arbitrators, who fixed the amount at $288, which amount defendant paid her. The report of these arbitrators recited that they assessed the value of the improvements on the property at the sum above...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Longworth v. Aslin
-
Merkle v. Powe
...were bound to apply the security to the particular debt specified or to be created. Poulson v. Collier, 18 Mo. App. 583; Longworth v. Aslin, 106 Mo. 155, 17 S. W. 294; Mo. Central Lumber Co. v. Stewart, 78 Mo. App. (7) The plaintiffs cannot claim title to the lumber itself under the pleadin......
-
Bloch v. Sammons
...had in good faith encouraged a purchaser to bid for and take a deed to it, was held estopped to set up a claim thereto. In Longworth v. Aslin, 106 Mo. 155, 17 S.W. 294, it decided (quoting from the syllabus) that, "where one advises and encourages another to buy an adverse title to land, he......
-
Mahen v. Tavern Rock
... ... claim. Curtis v. Moore, 162 Mo. 453; Mitchell v ... Smith, 14 S.W.2d 47; Longworth v. Aslin, 106 ... Mo. 155; Perry v. Hill, 75 Mo. 503; Snodgrass v ... Emery, 66 Mo.App. 467 ... Sturgis, ... C. Seddon and ... ...