Loraine v. State
Decision Date | 08 January 1887 |
Parties | LORAINE <I>v.</I> STATE.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Stayton & Kleberg and J. L. Hill, for appellant. Asst. Atty. Gen. Burts, for the State.
We are of opinion that the indictment in this case sufficiently charges the appellant with keeping a disorderly house. Pen. Code, art. 339; Willson, Crim. Forms, No. 218. But we are most clearly of the opinion that, as presented in the record, the evidence wholly fails to sustain the charge in the indictment, or the judgment of conviction which has been rendered in the court below. McElhaney v. State, 12 Tex. App. 231; Sara v. State, ante, 339, (present term.)
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
1. Reported by Messrs. Jackson & Jackson, official reporters of the Texas court of appeals.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Owens v. State
...implicate the person charged with keeping it in order to convict. See Sara v. State, 22 Tex. App. 639, 3 S. W. 339; Loraine v. State, 22 Tex. App. 640, 3 S. W. 340; Burton v. State, 16 Tex. App. 156; Allan v. State, 15 Tex. App. 320; Gamel v. State, 21 Tex. App. 357, 17 S. W. 158. It follow......
-
Machem v. State
...implicate the person charged with keeping it, in order to convict. See Sara v. State, 22 Tex. App. 639, 3 S. W. 339, Loraine v. State, 22 Tex. App. 640, 3 S. W. 340, Gambel v. State, 21 Tex. App. 357, 17 S. W. 158, Allen v. State, Tex. App. 320, and Burton v. State, 16 Tex. App. 156. Again,......
-
Ex Parte O'Conner
... ... It was proved, on behalf of the state, that the relator Mattie Collins came to the house of J. T. O'Conner and his wife, Abbie M. O'Conner, some time prior to October, 1886. Her name was ... ...