Lott v. Hull

Decision Date31 March 1913
CitationLott v. Hull, 104 Miss. 308, 61 So. 421 (Miss. 1913)
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesY. D. LOTT v. F. B. HULL ET AL

March, 1913

APPEAL from the chancery court of Hinds county, HON. G. G. LYELL, Chancellor.

Suit by Y. D. Lott against F. B. Hull, Jr., and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Affirmed.

V. Otis Robertson, for appellant.

Wells, May and Sanders, for appellee.

OPINION

COOK, J.

The case was submitted to the chancellor upon conflicting evidence. We are unable to reach the conclusion that the chancellor was manifestly wrong in his findings, and therefore the case is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Claxton v. Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corporation
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 14, 1937
    ... ... on appeal unless clearly erroneous ... Heard ... v. Cottrell, 56 So. 277, 100 Miss. 42; Lott v. Hull, ... 61 So. 421, 104 Miss. 308; Lee v. Wilkinson, 62 So ... 275, 105 Miss. 358; Bland v. Bland, 62 So. 641, 105 ... Miss. 478; Grace v ... ...
  • Stirling v. Logue
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • September 23, 1929
    ... ... Washington Nat. Bank, 9 Wash. 12; ... Maylor v. Sidener, 106 Ind. 179; Heard v ... Cottrell, 100 M. 42, 56 So. 277; (1913) Lott v ... Hull, 104 Miss. 308, 61 So. 421; (1913) Southern ... Plantations Co. v. Kennedy Heading Co., 104 Miss. 131, ... 61 So. 166; (1913) ... ...
  • Nubby v. Scott
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • September 11, 1939
    ... ... shows that his finding was wrong ... Heard ... v. Collrell, 100 Miss. 42; Lott v. Hull, 104 Miss ... 308; Lee v. Wilkerson, 105 Miss. 358; Bland v ... Bland, 105 Miss. 478; Grace v. Purce, 127 Miss ... 831; Crump v ... ...
  • Reber v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 4, 1932
    ... ... Miss. 890] decision on the facts can be based the decree will ... not be disturbed ... Heard ... v. Cottrell, 100 Miss. 42; Lott v. Hull, 104 Miss ... 308; Lee v. Wilkinson, 105 Miss. 358; Bland v ... Bland, 105 Miss. 478; Grace v. Pierce, 127 ... Miss. 831; Crump ... ...
  • Get Started for Free