Loudermilk v. Bailey

Decision Date14 January 1925
Docket Number4349.
Citation126 S.E. 373,159 Ga. 514
PartiesLOUDERMILK v. BAILEY.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

The omission of a prayer for process is amendable. Lyons v. Planters' Loan & Sav. Bank, 86 Ga. 485, 12 S.E. 882, 12 L.R.A. 155; Barnes-Fain Co. v. Chandler, 148 Ga. 158, 96 S.E. 179, and citations. Consequently the court erred in refusing to allow the amendment offered, adding a prayer for process, and in thereafter dismissing the action because there had been no legal process.

Error from Superior Court, Union County; J. B. Jones, Judge.

Action by S. B. Loudermilk against M. M. Bailey. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed.

Thos. A. Brown and B. L. Smith, both of Blue Ridge, for plaintiff in error.

J. G. Collins, of Gainesville, and Pat Haralson and T. S. Candler, both of Blairsville, for defendant in error.

RUSSELL, C.J.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT