Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Commonwealth

Decision Date08 May 1914
Citation166 S.W. 237,158 Ky. 773
PartiesLOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. COMMONWEALTH.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Kenton County, Criminal, Common Law, and Equity Division.

The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company was convicted of maintaining a nuisance, and appeals. Reversed, with directions to sustain demurrer to the indictment.

Benjamin D. Warfield, of Louisville, S.D. Rouse, of Covington, and Chas. H. Moorman, of Louisville, for appellant.

Jas Garnett, Atty. Gen., and Richard G. Williams Commonwealth's Atty., of Covington, for the Commonwealth.

TURNER J.

The grand jury of Kenton county returned the following indictment against appellant: "The grand jury of Kenton county, in the name and by the authority of the commonwealth of Kentucky, accuse Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a corporation, of the offense of maintaining and continuing a common public nuisance committed as follows, to wit: The said Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a corporation under the laws of the state of Kentucky between the first day of July, 1912, and the 17th day of February, 1913, in the county and state aforesaid, and before the finding of this indictment and within one year before the finding of this indictment, the said company being then and there a corporation under the laws of the state of Kentucky and as such then and there engaged in the operation of a railroad in the city of Covington by hauling and running cars coupled to and drawn by engines with steam power and in connection therewith did own, operate, manage and control what is known as the railroad yards in the said city, located, being and extending from Twentieth street, just west of Madison avenue through the southern part of said city, a distance of from one-half to three-quarters of a mile; that in said yards located in said city, the said company has and maintained many railroad tracks on which freight trains, cars and engines are daily and nightly run into and upon; that in shifting said cars, running and operating its engines in the yards aforesaid, the said company did unlawfully unreasonably and intentionally cause, suffer and permit, during said time aforesaid and for a long, unnecessary and unreasonable length of time, steam to escape from its engines in said yards, thereby causing sharp, loud and disagreeable noises, steam whistles to sound, making long, loud and piercing blasts, bells on said...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Com. v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • November 17, 1931
    ... 44 S.W.2d 830 241 Ky. 678 COMMONWEALTH" v. PHOENIX AMUSEMENT CO., Inc. Court of Appeals of Kentucky November 17, 1931 ...      \xC2" ... S.W. 865; Great Northern Refining Co. v. Lutes, 190 ... Ky. 451, 227 S.W. 795; Louisville & N. R. Co. v ... Com., 158 Ky. 774, 166 S.W. 237; City of Richmond v ... House, 177 Ky ... ...
  • Salisbury v. Wellman Electrical Co.
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • January 26, 1917
    ... ... 1623; ... Cohankus Mfg. Co. v. Rogers, 96 S.W. 437, 29 Ky. Law ... Rep. 748; City of Louisville" v. Caron, 90 S.W. 604, ... 28 Ky. Law Rep. 844; Crane v. Congleton, 116 S.W ...         \xC2" ... Buttimer, 146 Ky. 818, 143 ... S.W. 410; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Commonwealth, 158 Ky ... 773, 166 S.W. 237; Kentucky Traction & Ter. Co. v ... Peel, 160 Ky. 240, 169 S.W ... ...
  • Kentucky-Ohio Gas Co. v. Bowling
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • May 26, 1936
    ... ... 317, 2 S.Ct. 719, 27 ... L.Ed. 739; Petroleum Refining Co. v. Commonwealth, ... 192 Ky. 272, 232 S.W. 421. A fair test as to whether a ... business lawful in itself, or a ... Orton v. Virginia-Carolina ... Chemical Co., 33 Tex.Civ.App. 577, 77 S.W. 632; ... Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Com., 158 Ky. 773, 166 ... S.W. 237 ...          "The ... law is well ... ...
  • Kentucky-Ohio Gas Co. v. Bowling
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • May 26, 1936
    ...basis of an action to recover damages. Orton v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co., 33 Tex. Civ. App. 577, 77 S.W. 632; Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Com., 158 Ky. 773, 166 S.W. 237. "The law is well understood that every man has the exclusive dominion and right to the free enjoyment of his own prop......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT