Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Hopkins County
Decision Date | 14 May 1913 |
Citation | 156 S.W. 379,153 Ky. 718 |
Parties | LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. HOPKINS COUNTY et al. [d] |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Hopkins County.
Petition by Hopkins County and others to condemn a crossing over the tracks of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company for a new road. From an order requiring the railroad company to construct a bridge to carry the road over its tracks at its own expense, it appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Benjamin D. Warfield and C. H. Moorman, both of Louisville, and Laffoon & Waddill, of Madisonville, for appellant.
Latt F McLaughlin, of Madisonville, for appellees.
This proceeding was begun by a petition to the Hopkins county court to establish a new road to be known as the "McLaughlin Avenue Public Road" through the suburbs of the city of Madisonville. The proposed highway crosses the land and right of way of the appellant at a point where its road passes through a cut 22 feet deep. The county court tried the case upon the exceptions of appellant to the report of the commissioners, and established the road. The judgment also required Hopkins county to pay the appellant $1 as its damages for the location of the public road over appellant's right of way, and required appellant to construct and maintain a reasonably safe and suitable overhead bridge across said railroad tracks; and it also determined as a matter of law that it was the duty of the appellant to construct and maintain said overhead bridge at its own expense, and that it was not entitled to compensation therefor.
Upon an appeal to the circuit court by the appellant, the case was tried upon the following agreed statement of facts:
for said public road to approach the said railroad tracks at said point or in the vicinity thereof at grade.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Newport v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
... ... Appeal ... from Circuit Court, Campbell County ... Petition ... by City of Newport against the Louisville & Nashville ... the fifth class. Again, in L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Hopkins ... County, 153 Ky. 718, 156 S.W. 379, it was held that ... while the Legislature might prohibit ... ...
-
Tuscaloosa County v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.
... ... Co. v. People, supra; Town of O'Fallon v. Ohio & ... Miss. Ry. Co., 45 Ill.App. 572; Louisville & N. R ... Co. v. Hopkins County, 153 Ky. 718, 156 S.W. 379; ... City of Albia v. Chicago, B. & ... ...
-
City of Durham v. Southern R. Co.
... ... Appeal ... from Superior Court, Durham County; Connor, Judge ... Mandamus ... proceedings by the ... In ... Railroad v. Hopkins County, 153 Ky. 718, 156 S.W ... 379, the court held that a railroad ... ...
-
City of Indianapolis v. Indianapolis Water Co.
...Ill. App. 403, 407;State ex rel. v. Atchison, etc., R. Co., 95 Kan. 22, 25, 147 Pac. 801, L. R. A. 1915E, 751;Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Hopkins County, 153 Ky. 718, 156 S. W. 379;City of Albia v. Chicago, etc., R. Co. 102 Iowa, 624, 628, 71 N. W. 541;Town of O'Fallon v. Ohio, etc., R. Co.......