Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Allen

Decision Date18 March 1913
Citation152 Ky. 837,154 S.W. 371
PartiesLOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. ALLEN.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

On petition for rehearing. Petition overruled.

For former opinion, see 152 Ky. 145, 153 S.W. 198.

PER CURIAM.

Complaint is made in the petition for rehearing that the court erred in holding that all the shipments set up in the petition, for which an undercharge was made, are interstate shipments, when, in fact, some of them are not, and appellee asks that the case be reversed and the railroad company be allowed to recover only for such undercharges as were made on interstate shipments, and for any shipments that were intrastate no recovery should be had or allowed. The petition alleges that each item sued for arose under an interstate shipment. The language is as follows: "Each of said items are interstate shipments." This allegation was not traversed, and, there being no issue upon this point, the court accepted it as a conceded fact that they were interstate shipments, and it is now too late to complain that they were not. The rights of litigants are to be determined by the pleadings and the evidence, or proof, offered in support thereof. It is true counsel for appellee, in brief, insisted that a part of these shipments were intrastate; but, inasmuch as no issue was made upon this point in the pleadings, the statement in brief was not considered.

Petition for rehearing overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Edenton Cotton Mills v. Norfolk Southern R. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 8, 1919
    ...Cent. of Ga. R. Co. v. Curtis, 14 Ga.App. 716, 82 S.E. 318; L. & N. R. Co. v. Allen, 152 Ky. 145, 153 S.W. 198 (s. c. reaffirmed, 152 Ky. 837, 154 S.W. 371); Ga. R. Co. Creety, 5 Ga.App. 424, 63 S.E. 528; Schenberger v. Union Pac. R. Co., 84 Kan. 79, 113 P. 433, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 391. It ......
  • Mills v. Norfolk Southern R. Co
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 8, 1919
    ...of Ga. R. Co. v. Curtis, 14 Ga. App. 716, 82 S. E. 318; L. & N. R. Co. v. Allen, 152 Ky. 145, 153 S. W. 198 (s. c. reaffirmed, 152 Ky. 837, 154 S. W. 371); Ga. R. Co. v. Creety, 5 Ga. App. 424, 63 S. E. 528; Schenberger v. Union Pac. R. Co., 84 Kan. 79, 113 Pac. 433, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 391......
  • Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. Secrest
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • June 2, 1931
    ... ... that of clerk or chief engine dispatcher for the Louisville & ... Nashville Railroad Company at Ravenna, Ky. and it is so given ... in the policy. In ... v. First National ... Bank, 142 Ky. 578, 134 S.W. 886; Louisville & N. R ... R. Co. v. Allen, 152 Ky. 837, 154 S.W. 371; ... Jefferson's Adm'r v. Bogard's ... Adm'rs, 159 Ky. 376, 167 S.W ... ...
  • Benefit Association of Ry. Employees v. Secrest
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • June 2, 1931
    ...be raised here for the first time. Maysville Telephone Co. v. First National Bank, 142 Ky. 578, 134 S.W. 886; Louisville & N.R.R. Co. v. Allen, 152 Ky. 837, 154 S.W. 371; Jefferson's Adm'r v. Bogard's Adm'rs, 159 Ky. 376, 167 S.W. 150; Walters' Guardian v. Ransdell, 218 Ky. 267, 291 S.W. 39......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT