Lovin Mood, Inc. v. Bush
| Decision Date | 31 January 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-2614,96-2614 |
| Citation | 687 So.2d 61 |
| Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly D339 LOVIN MOOD, INC., Appellant, v. Doreen BUSH and James Bush, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
David W. Hiers and Robert D. Bell of Bell, Schuster, Wheeler & Hiers, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.
Roger M. Sherman, Pensacola, for Appellees.
Lovin Mood, Inc., appeals an amended nonfinal order denying its motion for summary judgment in a negligence action brought by employee Doreen Bush for injuries sustained by Bush in an attack and rape committed by an alleged "customer" in its store. Lovin Mood sought summary judgment based on the immunity provided by section 440.11 of the Worker's Compensation Law. Holding that Lovin Mood is entitled to such immunity, we reverse and remand.
This court has jurisdiction to review the order appealed, as no material facts are in dispute and the only issue remaining is whether Lovin Mood is entitled to worker's compensation immunity as a matter of law. See rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vi), Fla. R.App. P.; Gustafson's Dairy, Inc. v. Phiel, 681 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)("As in Hastings [v. Demming, 682 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) ], we conclude that Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vi) is intended 'to apply only when an appellate court is presented with a record with facts so manifest it can readily conclude that a plaintiff's exclusive remedy is in fact workers' compensation....' " ).
On the day of the attack, Bush was working alone in Lovin Mood's Mariner Mall location, a store located in a somewhat isolated area of the mall. At approximately 11:45 a.m., a lone male "customer" entered Lovin Mood and asked Bush if they carried a certain type of underwear. The "customer" lured Bush to the rear of the store and suddenly began beating her about the head. The "customer" then dragged her into the store's back office and raped her.
We hold that these undisputed facts establish the necessary causal connection between Bush's injuries and her employment. See § 440.09(1) Fla. Stat.; and see, e.g., Jean Barnes Collections v. Elston, 413 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)( employer's contention that claimant's injury resulting from assault and rape did not arise out of course and scope of employment where claimant was traveling at employer's request); Jenkins v. Wilson, 397 So.2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)( employer's contention that claimant's injury resulting from rape in company parking lot did not arise out of her...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Locke v. Suntrust Bank
...the wrongful death suit. Winn Dixie, 620 So.2d at 799 (citing, inter alia, Sullivan, 454 So.2d 52); see also Lovin Mood, Inc. v. Bush, 687 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. Dist.Ct.App.1997) (finding "the necessary causal connection between" the plaintiff's injuries and her employment to trigger the worke......
-
Ruiz v. Aerorep Group Corp.
...from any other liability for the injury. FCCI Ins. Co. v. Horne, 890 So.2d 1141, 1143 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Lovin Mood, Inc. v. Bush, 687 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). While there are exceptions to worker's compensation immunity, there are no allegations in the second amended complaint s......
-
Indian Harbor Ins. Co. v. Williams
...941 So.2d 505, 507 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (citing FCCI Ins. Co. v. Horne, 890 So.2d 1141, 1143 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Lovin Mood, Inc. v. Bush, 687 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)) ("When an employee's injury arises out of the course and scope of his or her employment, worker's compensation is t......