Low v. Gray
Decision Date | 08 June 1910 |
Citation | 130 S.W. 270 |
Parties | LOW et al. v. GRAY. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Colorado County; M. Kennon, Judge.
Action by George Gray against Fred Low and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, all defendants except J. F. Liken appeal. Affirmed.
Adkins & Green, for appellants. Townsend, Ayars & Townsend and Carothers & Brown, for appellee.
This suit was brought, in the ordinary form of an action of trespass to try title, by George Gray against Fred, Louis, Earl, and Laberta Low, Jennie Hale, W. Ed. Low, Clara Low, Fannie Huff, Charles W. Huff, and F. N. Hale, and J. A. McWaid, W. A. McWaid, and J. B. Low, and also J. F. Liken, to recover an undivided one-third of 3,496 acres of land, situated in Colorado county, Tex., described in plaintiff's first amended original petition, upon which the case was tried. It alleged that all the defendants, except J. A. McWaid, W. A. McWaid, and J. B. Low, and also J. F. Liken, are the heirs of W. H. Low, deceased, through whom they claim title, and that Liken also claims an undivided one-third interest in said 3,496 acres. The defendants, who are the appellants, interposed a general demurrer, pleading the statutes of two, four, three, five, and ten years' limitation, innocent purchasers, a general denial, and not guilty. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff against defendants for one-third undivided interest in the land described in plaintiff's petition, as prayed for. From this judgment all the defendants except J. F. Liken, whose one-third interest was not affected by it, have appealed.
On October 11, 1900, Frank A. Ramsey executed a general warranty deed to W. H. Low conveying to him an undivided one-third interest in the land described in plaintiff's petition. It recites the consideration of $4,000, of which $2,500 is recited cash, and $1,770.66 in the grantee's assuming the payment of certain incumbrances on the land to that amount, with interest thereon. And on October 13, 1900, Samuel S. Liken executed to W. H. Low a general warranty deed, conveying to him an undivided one-third interest in all of said lands. This deed recites, as the consideration, a deed from the grantee to the grantor to 320 acres of land in Washington county, Colo., and the further consideration of $3,270.66 paid and secured to be paid as follows: $1,500 in cash, $1,770.66 by the grantee's assuming the payment of certain specified incumbrances on the land conveyed. W. H. Low, through these two deeds, is the common source of title. The plaintiff claims under him through an express parol trust; all the defendants except J. A. McWaid, W. A. McWaid, and J. B. Low, claim as his heirs; and each of the last-named defendants claims under a deed made to him by W. H. Low, conveying him two-thirds interest in a designated part of the land sued for. That J. F. Liken owns the remaining one-third of the land is conceded by all the parties. The heirship of such defendants as claim through W. H. Low by inheritance is not disputed. The only issues of fact are: (1) Whether there was such a parol agreement between the plaintiff and W. H. Low, and performance of it on the part of the former, at the time the deeds above mentioned were made to the latter, as to vest equitable title to an undivided one-third interest in the land described in them in the plaintiff and constitute Low his trustee under said deeds as his trustee for such interest in the lands; (2) whether the McWaids and J. B. Low, or any of them, were bona fide purchasers for value without notice of plaintiff's equitable title at the time each purchased the part of the land claimed by him; and (3) whether plaintiff's equitable title was barred by any of the statutes of limitation.
Upon all these issues the trial court found as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McWhorter v. Oliver
...Texas L. & Land Co. v. Blalock, 76 Tex. 89, 13 S. W. 12; Tolar v. Texas Development Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 153 S. W. 911; Low v. Gray, 61 Tex. Civ. App. 487, 130 S. W. 270; Collum v. Sanger Bros., 98 Tex. 162, 82 S. W. 459, 83 S. W. 184; Harris v. Hamilton (Tex. Com. App.) 221 S. W. 273; Mars......
-
Binford v. Snyder
...Morris v. Rhine, Tex. Sup., 8 S.W. 315, loc.cit. 317; Wade v. Boyd, 24 Tex.Civ.App. 492, 60 S.W. 360, writ refused; Low v. Gray, 61 Tex.Civ. App. 487, 130 S.W. 270, 272, writ refused; Mason v. Bender, Tex.Civ.App., 97 S.W. 715; Tompkins v. Broocks, Tex.Civ.App., 43 S.W. 70; Betzer v. Goff, ......
-
Sperry v. Moody
...and they cite several cases as authority supporting their view. But we think only one of the number cited, to wit, Low v. Gray, 61 Tex. Civ. App. 487, 130 S. W. 270, does support it. In that case, as here, it seems, the plaintiff was asserting an equitable right against holders of the legal......
-
MacDonald v. Sanders, 6321.
...but we are listing a few. Allen v. Allen, 101 Tex. 362, 107 S.W. 528; Gardner v. Randell, 70 Tex. 453, 7 S.W. 781; Low v. Gray, 61 Tex.Civ. App. 487, 130 S.W. 270. In the instant case, in the absence of fact fact findings by the trial judge, the evidence will be viewed in the light most fav......