Lowe v. California League of Prof. Baseball
Decision Date | 01 July 1997 |
Docket Number | No. E017721,E017721 |
Citation | 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 105,56 Cal.App.4th 112 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | , 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5283, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8521 John LOWE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL, et al., Defendants and Respondents. |
*
John Lowe (Plaintiff) was seriously injured when struck on the left side of his face by a foul ball while attending a professional baseball The Quakes, at their home games, feature a mascot who goes by the name of "Tremor." He is a caricature of a dinosaur, standing seven feet tall with a tail which protrudes out from the costume. Tremor was performing his antics in the stands just along the left field foul line. Tremor was behind plaintiff and had been touching him with his (Tremor's) tail. Plaintiff was thereby distracted and turned toward Tremor. In the next moment, just as plaintiff returned his attention to the playing field, he was struck by a foul ball before he could react to it.
game. The game was being played at "The Epicenter," home field of the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes, Class "A," minor league baseball team.
Very serious injuries resulted from the impact. As a result, the underlying action was commenced against the California League of Professional Baseball and Valley Baseball Club, Inc., which does business as the Quakes (defendants). The case was resolved in the trial court by summary judgment entered in favor of defendants.
Defendants were able to persuade the trial court, under the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk (Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2, 834 P.2d 696), that defendants owed no duty to plaintiff, as a spectator, to protect him from foul balls. Such rationalization was faulty. Under Knight, defendants had a duty not to increase the inherent risks to which spectators at professional baseball games are regularly exposed and which they assume. As a result, a triable issue of fact remained, namely whether the Quakes' mascot cavorting in the stands and distracting plaintiff's attention, while the game was in progress, constituted a breach of that duty, i.e., constituted negligence in the form of increasing the inherent risk to plaintiff of being struck by a foul ball.
Thus, the trial court improperly granted the motion for summary judgment and it must be reversed accordingly.
In the action, filed after his injury, plaintiff's complaint was styled in a single count, a refreshing example of clear and concise pleading. The key charging allegations were contained in two paragraphs:
After an unsuccessful demurrer, defendants noticed a motion for summary judgment. 1
The notice contained no recitation of the grounds for the motion. However, as required by statute, defendants filed a separate statement of undisputed facts. Without the accompanying tabulation here of evidence for such statement of facts, they included: "1. On July 26, 1994, at approximately 7:05 p.m., plaintiff was in attendance at a baseball game between the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes and the San Bernardino Spirit at the Epicenter baseball facility and was seated in an area of As evidentiary support for their motion, defendants filed the declaration of Joseph M. Gagliardi, president of the California League of Professional Baseball. Such declaration pointed out that seven of the ten teams in the California League have mascots. Among other things, the Gagliardi declaration stated, Defendants also filed extended excerpts of plaintiff's deposition, supported by the authenticating declaration of James L. Price, counsel for plaintiff. These deposition excerpts provide an insight into how plaintiff was injured:
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
[p] "I could see the stump of the tail hitting me....
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
Plaintiff filed opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Such opposition included a response to defendants' undisputed statement of facts. As to defendants' statement No. 2, namely that "plaintiff was struck by a foul ball by the Quakes mascot, Tremor, who was entertaining in the area where plaintiff was seated," plaintiff disputed it. In direct response, plaintiff declared, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kahn v. East Side Union High School Dist.
...Rptr.2d 598; Ferrari v. Grand Canyon Dories (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 248, 252, 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 65; Lowe v. California League of Prof Baseball (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 112, 122, 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 105.) The moving party's evidence is strictly construed, while that of the opponent is liberally construed......
-
Shin v. Ahn
...is unavailable. (E.g., Campbell v. Derylo (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 823, 830, 89 Cal.Rptr.2d 519; Lowe v. California League of Prof. Baseball (1997) 56 Cal. App.4th 112, 123, 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 105.) Accordingly, because it would have been an error in law for the trial court to summary judgment on ......
-
Summer J. v. U.S. Baseball Fed'n
...such source.’ " ( Id . at p. 729, 46 P.2d 144.) More than 60 years later, the court of appeal in Lowe v. California League of Prof. Baseball (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 112, 123, 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 105 noted, "[F]oul balls hit into the spectators’ area clearly create a risk of injury. If such foul ba......
-
Mayes v. La Sierra Univ.
...from reaching into the spectator areas to catch foul balls. ( Ibid. )A more recent case, Lowe v. California League of Prof. Baseball (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 112, 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 105 ( Lowe ), illustrates that distractions, which are extraneous to the game of baseball, are not risks inherent in......
-
Chapter § 5.04 TOUR OPERATORS, WHOLESALERS AND PUBLIC CHARTERS
...v. Tyson, 701 N.Y.S.2d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000).[822] See, e.g.: California: Lowe v. California League of Professional Baseball, 56 Cal. App. 4th 112, 65 Cal. Rptr. 2d 105 (1997) (fan struck by baseball). Illinois: Jasper v. Chicago National League Ball Club, Inc., 309 Ill. App. 3d 124, 72......