Lowery v. Redd
Decision Date | 29 September 1993 |
Docket Number | 93-1153,Nos. 92-2450,92-2551,s. 92-2450 |
Parties | NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jerry LOWERY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. T. E. REDD, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; Larry STOVALL, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer, Defendants-Appellants, and J.V. Simmons, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; City of South Boston, Virginia, Defendants. Jerry Lowery, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.E. Redd, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; Larry Stovall, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; J.V. Simmons, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; City of South Boston, Virginia, Defendants-Appellees, and J. V. Simmons, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; City of South Boston, Virginia, Defendants. Jerry Lowery, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T. E. Redd, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; -Larry Stovall, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; -J. V. Simmons, Individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; City of South Boston, Virginia, Defendants-Appellees. . Argued: |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville.
John H. OBrion, Jr., Cowan & Owen, P.C., for appellants.
G. Rodney Sager, Rod Sager & Associates, for appellee.
Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
In the early morning of February 1, 1991, during a traffic stop gone awry, Jerry Lowery was shot in the head by Larry Stovall, a police officer for the city of South Boston, Virginia. Lowery later brought this suit, alleging claims under state law and 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985, against Stovall; Thomas E. Redd, the other officer on the scene; J. V. Simmons, the chief of police for the city of South Boston; and the city itself.
After some discovery, the defendants moved for summary judgment. Redd and Stovall's motions were based on qualified immunity.
The district court denied Stovall's motion because, if Lowery's assertions of fact were true, no reasonable officer could have...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wilkerson v. Thrift
...Plaintiffs' assertions of facts are true, no reasonable officer could have believed his conduct was warranted. Lowery v. Redd, 14 F.3d 595 (table), 1993 WL 527998 (4th Cir.1993). These allegations are sufficient to withstand dismissal at this point in the absence of sworn evidence from the ......
-
Wilkerson v. Thrift, Civil No. 1:99CV127 (W.D.N.C. 8/4/2000), Civil No. 1:99CV127.
...Plaintiffs' assertions of facts are true, no reasonable officer could have believed his conduct was warranted. Lowery v. Redd, 14 F.3d 595 (table), 1993 WL 527998 (4th Cir. 1993). These allegations are sufficient to withstand dismissal at this point in the absence of sworn evidence from the......
-
Lowery v. Stovall
...and based upon the reasoning of the district court, we affirmed in toto the district court's decision. Lowery v. Redd, 14 F.3d 595, 1993 WL 527998 (4th Cir. Dec.21, 1993) (unpublished), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2676, 129 L.Ed.2d 811 While this case was pending on remand, Lower......