Lowther Oil Co. v. Guffey
Decision Date | 14 January 1903 |
Citation | 43 S.E. 101,52 W.Va. 88 |
Parties | LOWTHER OIL CO. v. GUFFEY et al. |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Submitted June 7, 1902.
Syllabus by the Court.
1. Where a grant of oil and gas, and oil and gas privileges, in consideration of $1, without limitation as to time, contains a forfeiture clause in these words: "In case no well is completed within two years from this date, then this grant shall immediately become null and void as to both parties provided, that second party may prevent such forfeiture from year to year by paying to the first annually in advance eighteen and 75/100 dollars, at her residence, until such well is completed,"--such lease is thereby converted into a lease from year to year, at the option of the lessee until a well is completed. It would then continue so long as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities.
Appeal from circuit court, Calhoun county; Warren Miller, Judge.
Bill by the Lowther Oil Company against James M. Guffey and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed.
Edward A. Brannon and R. L. Bland, for appellants.
John M HamiltoN and T. P. JACOBS, for appellee.
DENT P.
James M. Guffey appeals from a decree of the circuit court of Calhoun county canceling a certain oil and gas lease executed to him by Ella Yoak and husband in a certain chancery suit wherein appellant was defendant and the Lowther Oil Company was plaintiff; and the lease filed with the said bill from Ella and A. T. Yoak to James M. Guffey, and referred to as "Exhibit B," is in the words and figures following, to wit:
Appellant did not drill a well on the land, but paid up the commutation money until the 13th day of April, 1901. In March, 1901, he took possession, and began drilling, and tendered his lessors the commutation money of $18.75, and a further sum increasing the aggregate to $75, if they would permit him to continue operations without...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Musgrave v. Musgrave
...... assessed to him for taxation. Later cases declare the. lessee's right to produce oil, after discovery, is a. vested right. Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Oil. Co., 53 W.Va. 501, 44 S.E. 433, 97 Am.St.Rep. 1027;. Parish Fork Oil Co. v. Bridgewater Gas Co., 51 W.Va. 583, 42 S.E. 655, 59 L.R.A. 566; Lowther Oil Co. v. Guffey, 52 W.Va. 88, 43 S.E. 101; Steelsmith v. Gartlan, 45 W.Va. 27, 29 S.E. 978, 44 L.R.A. 107. But. they do not define the right in terms. They ......
-
Rich v. Doneghey
...... sufficient consideration to bind the lessor in a surrender. clause lease such as we have here under consideration:. Guffey v. Smith, 237 U.S. 101, 116, 35 S.Ct. 526,. 59 L.Ed. 856; Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co., 140 F. 801, 72 C. C. A. 213; Allegheny Oil Co. v. ...Rep. 144; Central Ohio Nat. Gas & Fuel Co. v. Eckert, 70 Ohio St. 127, 71 N.E. 281;. Brown v. Fowler, 65 Ohio St. 507, 63 N.E. 76;. Lowther Oil Co. v. Guffey, 52 W.Va. 88, 43 S.E. 101; Lovett v. Eastern Oil Co., 68 W.Va. 667, 70. S.E. 707, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 360; So. Penn Oil Co. v. ......
-
Brown v. Wilson
...Eaton v. Allegany Gas Co., 122 N.Y. 416, 25 N.E. 981; Dickey v. Coffeyville Vit. B. & T. Co., 69 Kan. 106, 76 P. 398; Lowther Oil Co. v. Guffey, 52 W.Va. 88, 43 S.E. 101; Tucker v. Watts, 25 Ohio Cir. Ct. R. 320; on Oil & Gas, §§ 134, 135; Graves v. Gas Co., 83 Iowa, 714, 50 N.W. 283; White......
-
Eastern Oil Co. v. Coulehan
...566, Crawford v. Ritchey, 43 W.Va. 252, 27 S.E. 920, Steelsmith v. Gartlan, 45 W.Va. 27, 29 S.E. 978, 44 L.R.A. 107, Lowther Oil Co. v. Guffey, 52 W.Va. 88, 43 S.E. 101, Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Co., 53 W.Va. 44 S.E. 433, 97 Am.St.Rep. 1027, Pyle v. Henderson, 55 W.Va. 122, 46 S.E. ......